Lavanya Pashikanti1, Diane Von Ah. 1. Indiana University Health Bloomington, Indianapolis, Indiana. lpashikanti@iuhealth.org
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review article was to examine the efficacy of an early mobilization protocol in hospitalized medical-surgical inpatient population. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Prolonged immobilization can result in functional decline and heighten the risk for hospital-associated complications such as falls and pressure ulcers. Early mobilization, on the other hand, has been shown to prevent functional decline and hospital-associated complications. However, currently no evidence-based guidelines exist with regard to an early mobilization protocol for the medical-surgical inpatient population. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to provide a thorough analysis of current evidence pertaining to an early mobilization protocol for the medical-surgical inpatient population. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using Ovid, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases using the following search terms: early ambulation, postoperative care, and length of stay. OUTCOME: We found a total of 9 empirical studies that met the inclusion criteria. Studies revealed that using the basic tenets of an early mobilization protocol was associated with improved outcomes for patients with deep vein thrombosis, reduced length of stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, and maintained or improved functional status from admission to discharge of hospitalized older adults and patients recovering from major surgery. INTERPRETATION/ CONCLUSION: Overall, our review found that early mobilization (especially early ambulation) of the medical-surgical inpatient population may improve patient outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: Our review indicated that the greatest impact of early mobilization is through standardized mobility protocols or programs. Clinical nurse specialists are experts in leading and sustaining standardized protocols or programs pertaining to a nurse-sensitive outcome such as mobility.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review article was to examine the efficacy of an early mobilization protocol in hospitalized medical-surgical inpatient population. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Prolonged immobilization can result in functional decline and heighten the risk for hospital-associated complications such as falls and pressure ulcers. Early mobilization, on the other hand, has been shown to prevent functional decline and hospital-associated complications. However, currently no evidence-based guidelines exist with regard to an early mobilization protocol for the medical-surgical inpatient population. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to provide a thorough analysis of current evidence pertaining to an early mobilization protocol for the medical-surgical inpatient population. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using Ovid, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases using the following search terms: early ambulation, postoperative care, and length of stay. OUTCOME: We found a total of 9 empirical studies that met the inclusion criteria. Studies revealed that using the basic tenets of an early mobilization protocol was associated with improved outcomes for patients with deep vein thrombosis, reduced length of stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, and maintained or improved functional status from admission to discharge of hospitalized older adults and patients recovering from major surgery. INTERPRETATION/ CONCLUSION: Overall, our review found that early mobilization (especially early ambulation) of the medical-surgical inpatient population may improve patient outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: Our review indicated that the greatest impact of early mobilization is through standardized mobility protocols or programs. Clinical nurse specialists are experts in leading and sustaining standardized protocols or programs pertaining to a nurse-sensitive outcome such as mobility.
Authors: Heidi L Wald; Luci K Leykum; Melissa L P Mattison; Eduard E Vasilevskis; David O Meltzer Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Virginia Wang; Kelli Allen; Courtney H Van Houtven; Cynthia Coffman; Nina Sperber; Elizabeth P Mahanna; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Helen Hoenig; George L Jackson; Teresa M Damush; Erika Price; Susan N Hastings Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Saki Miwa; Paul Visintainer; Richard Engelman; Amanda Miller; Tara Lagu; Erin Woodbury; Peter K Lindenauer; Quinn R Pack Journal: Am J Med Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Barbara Resnick; N Jennifer Klinedinst; Laura Yerges-Armstrong; Jay Magaziner; Denise Orwig; Marc C Hochberg; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Susan G Dorsey Journal: Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs Date: 2019-03-23
Authors: Ryan S Marder; Ian Gopie; Chibuokem P Ikwuazom; Declan Tozzi; Neil V Shah; Qais Naziri; Aditya V Maheshwari Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2022-06-05
Authors: Seung Eun Lee; Woo Hyun Cho; Sang Kwon Lee; Ki Sup Byun; Bong Soo Son; Doosoo Jeon; Yun Seong Kim; Hye Ju Yeo Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2019-04