| Literature DB >> 22336004 |
Vinicius Pires Rincão1, Kristie Aimi Yamamoto, Nágila Maria Pontes Silva Ricardo, Sandra Aguiar Soares, Luzia Doretto Paccola Meirelles, Carlos Nozawa, Rosa Elisa Carvalho Linhares.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lentinula edodes, known as shiitake, has been utilized as food, as well as, in popular medicine, moreover, compounds isolated from its mycelium and fruiting body have shown several therapeutic properties. The aim of this study was to determine the antiviral activity of aqueous (AqE) and ethanol (EtOHE) extracts and polysaccharide (LeP) from Lentinula edodes in the replication of poliovirus type 1 (PV-1) and bovine herpes virus type 1 (BoHV-1).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22336004 PMCID: PMC3292946 DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-9-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Figure 1.
Chemical displacements characteristics of β(1→6) and α(1→4) glucans present in the purified polysaccharides isolated from Lentinula edodes
| Configurations | Chemical displacements (ppm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | |
| β(1→6) | 103.5 | 73.7 | 75.6 | 70.4 | 75.6 | 69.7 |
| α(1→4) | 99.9 | 72.4 | 76.4 | 81.3 | 71.1 | 61.6 |
Antiviral activity of aqueous extract (AqE), ethanol extract (EtOHE) and polysaccharide (LeP) of Lentinula edodes for poliovirus and bovine herpesvirus, monitored by plaque assay
| Substances | CC50a | PV-1 | BHV-1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50b | SIc | IC50 | SI | ||
| AqE | 74.0 | 12.7 | 5.82 | 8.2 | 9.02 |
| EtOHE | 25.8 | 1.30 | 19.85 | 2.13 | 12.11 |
| LeP | > 4.0 | 0.19 | > 21.33 | 0.1 | > 39.21 |
a Fifty percent cytotoxic concentration (mg/ml)
b Fifty percent inhibitory concentration (mg/ml)
c Selectivity index
Figure 2Effect of . The extract was utilized in the indicated concentrations before (-1 and -2), during (0) and after infection (1 and 2). The experiments were carried out in triplicate, and the percent of the inhibition is represented with the respective standard deviations.
Figure 3Effect of . The extract was utilized in the indicated concentrations before (-1 and -2), during (0) and after infection (1 and 2). The experiments were carried out in triplicate, and the percent of the inhibition is represented with the respective standard deviations.
Figure 4Effect of . The extract was utilized in the indicated concentrations before (-1 and -2), during (0) and after infection (1 and 2). The experiments were carried out in triplicate, and the percent of the inhibition is represented with the respective standard deviations.