Literature DB >> 22335620

Evidence of inbreeding depression but not inbreeding avoidance in a natural house sparrow population.

Anna M Billing1, Aline M Lee, Sigrun Skjelseth, Asa A Borg, Matthew C Hale, Jon Slate, Henrik Pärn, Thor H Ringsby, Bernt-Erik Saether, Henrik Jensen.   

Abstract

Inbreeding is common in small and threatened populations and often has a negative effect on individual fitness and genetic diversity. Thus, inbreeding can be an important factor affecting the persistence of small populations. In this study, we investigated the effects of inbreeding on fitness in a small, wild population of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) on the island of Aldra, Norway. The population was founded in 1998 by four individuals (one female and three males). After the founder event, the adult population rapidly increased to about 30 individuals in 2001. At the same time, the mean inbreeding coefficient among adults increased from 0 to 0.04 by 2001 and thereafter fluctuated between 0.06 and 0.10, indicating a highly inbred population. We found a negative effect of inbreeding on lifetime reproductive success, which seemed to be mainly due to an effect of inbreeding on annual reproductive success. This resulted in selection against inbred females. However, the negative effect of inbreeding was less strong in males, suggesting that selection against inbred individuals is at least partly sex specific. To examine whether individuals avoided breeding with close relatives, we compared observed inbreeding and kinship coefficients in the population with those obtained from simulations of random mating. We found no significant differences between the two, indicating weak or absent inbreeding avoidance. We conclude that there was inbreeding depression in our population. Despite this, birds did not seem to actively avoid mating with close relatives, perhaps as a consequence of constraints on mating possibilities in such a small population.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22335620     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05490.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  11 in total

1.  Relatedness communicated in lemur scent.

Authors:  Toni Lyn Morelli; R Andrew Hayes; Helen F Nahrung; Thomas E Goodwin; Innocent H Harelimana; Laura J Macdonald; Patricia C Wright
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-07-02

2.  Consistent scaling of inbreeding depression in space and time in a house sparrow metapopulation.

Authors:  Alina K Niskanen; Anna M Billing; Håkon Holand; Ingerid J Hagen; Yimen G Araya-Ajoy; Arild Husby; Bernt Rønning; Ane Marlene Myhre; Peter Sjolte Ranke; Thomas Kvalnes; Henrik Pärn; Thor Harald Ringsby; Sigbjørn Lien; Bernt-Erik Sæther; Stefanie Muff; Henrik Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Correlates of egg size variation in a population of house sparrow Passer domesticus.

Authors:  Thomas Kvalnes; Thor Harald Ringsby; Henrik Jensen; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  What happens after inbreeding avoidance? Inbreeding by rejected relatives and the inclusive fitness benefit of inbreeding avoidance.

Authors:  A Bradley Duthie; Jane M Reid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Demographic mechanisms of inbreeding adjustment through extra-pair reproduction.

Authors:  Jane M Reid; A Bradley Duthie; Matthew E Wolak; Peter Arcese
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Resolving the conundrum of inbreeding depression but no inbreeding avoidance: Estimating sex-specific selection on inbreeding by song sparrows (Melospiza melodia).

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Peter Arcese; Greta Bocedi; A Bradley Duthie; Matthew E Wolak; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The genomic mosaicism of hybrid speciation.

Authors:  Tore O Elgvin; Cassandra N Trier; Ole K Tørresen; Ingerid J Hagen; Sigbjørn Lien; Alexander J Nederbragt; Mark Ravinet; Henrik Jensen; Glenn-Peter Sætre
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Effects of inbreeding on fitness-related traits in a small isolated moose population.

Authors:  Hallvard Haanes; Stine S Markussen; Ivar Herfindal; Knut H Røed; Erling J Solberg; Morten Heim; Liv Midthjell; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Subsocial Cockroaches Nauphoeta cinerea Mate Indiscriminately with Kin Despite High Costs of Inbreeding.

Authors:  Sofia Bouchebti; Virginie Durier; Cristian Pasquaretta; Colette Rivault; Mathieu Lihoreau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Feed-backs among inbreeding, inbreeding depression in sperm traits, and sperm competition can drive evolution of costly polyandry.

Authors:  Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.