Literature DB >> 15362795

Laparoscopic and open approach in perforated peptic ulcer.

Hiroaki Tsumura1, Toru Ichikawa, Eiso Hiyama, Yoshiaki Murakami.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To improve the perioperative course and quality of life of the patients with perforated peptic ulcer, we investigated the conversion risk factors in laparoscopic simple closure and omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 71 patients with a mean age of 46 years (rage, 17-81 years) was examined, and their clinical data was recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: The postoperative durations of nasogastric tube insertion, ileus, analgesic requirement, resuming diet, and hospital stay were shorter in the patients with laparoscopic simple closure than in those with open simple closure and omental patch repair. Univariate regression analysis revealed that the age, American Society of Anesthesiologist classification, presence of concomitant disease, and length of free air or fluid collection shown in abdominal computerized tomography significantly correlated with the conversion of laparoscopic simple closure and omental patch repair to open simple closure and omental patch repair.
CONCLUSIONS: These conversion factors are useful to achieve appropriate surgical treatments for perforated peptic ulcer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15362795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  5 in total

1.  Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: Factors Predicting Conversion in Laparoscopy and Postoperative Septic Complications.

Authors:  Markus K Muller; Simon Wrann; Jeannette Widmer; Jennifer Klasen; Markus Weber; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Ten-Year Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Repair versus Open Closure of Perforated.

Authors:  Vishwanath Golash
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2008-10

Review 3.  Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  S Sauerland; F Agresta; R Bergamaschi; G Borzellino; A Budzynski; G Champault; A Fingerhut; A Isla; M Johansson; P Lundorff; B Navez; S Saad; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Emergency laparoscopy--current best practice.

Authors:  Oliver Warren; James Kinross; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.