Literature DB >> 22334828

Patients with syncope in a German emergency department: description of patients and processes.

Sebastian Güldner1, Viktoria Langada, Steffen Popp, Hans Jürgen Heppner, Harald Mang, Michael Christ.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We studied the characteristics and resource utilization of patients with syncope in a German emergency department (ED).
METHODS: We carried out a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with syncope who presented to the ED of the Klinikum Nürnberg (a municipal hospital in Nuremberg, Germany).
RESULTS: Among the 28 477 patients who presented to the ED from 15 May 2009 to 30 September 2009, 440 (1.5%) presented with syncope. Their mean age was 62 years (standard deviation, 20 years); 50.4% were women, 43.4% were over age 70, 11.8% had cardiogenic and 4.8% neurological syncope, and 18.2% had more than two comorbid conditions. 20.7% were discharged after evaluation in the ED, 14.1% were brielfly hospitalized in the ED's clinical observation unit, and 56.6% were admitted to one of the hospital's specialty wards. 8.6% left the ED against medical advice. All of the syncope patients were evaluated by history-taking, physical examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogragraphy (ECG); ECG revealed abnormal findings in 36.4% of patients. Nearly all patients also underwent laboratory testing, which revealed hyponatremia (a serum sodium concentration under 130 mmol/L) in 5.9% and a serum creatinine level above 2 mg/dL in 5.3%. Many underwent technology-intensive tests such as cranial computed tomography (129 patients), but these tests only rarely yielded abnormal findings (3.1%). 27% of the syncope patients underwent Doppler ultrasonography of the vessels supplying the brain, with abnormal findings in 6.7% of cases. (Orthostatic testing was performed in 14.5% of the patients and was positive in 26.6%.)
CONCLUSION: Many patients presenting with syncope to a German ED are elderly, and multiple comorbidities are common. Technology-intensive testing in patients with syncope has a low diagnostic yield and consumes resources. The introduction of standards for the evaluation of syncope in the ED would be helpful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22334828      PMCID: PMC3278749          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  24 in total

1.  Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes.

Authors:  James Quinn; Daniel McDermott; Ian Stiell; Michael Kohn; George Wells
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes.

Authors:  James V Quinn; Ian G Stiell; Daniel A McDermott; Karen L Sellers; Michael A Kohn; George A Wells
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope.

Authors:  J Stephen Huff; Wyatt W Decker; James V Quinn; Andrew D Perron; Anthony M Napoli; Suzanne Peeters; Andy S Jagoda
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Diagnostic yield and utility of neurovascular ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with syncope.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Schnipper; Robert H Ackerman; Joel B Krier; Melissa Honour
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Recurrent syncope in elderly patients and tilt test table outcome: the role of comorbidities.

Authors:  F Vetta; S Ronzoni; M Costarella; C Donadio; L Battista; G Renzulli; G Gentile; S M Zuccaro
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Epidemiological characteristics and diagnostic approach in patients admitted to the emergency room for transient loss of consciousness: Group for Syncope Study in the Emergency Room (GESINUR) study.

Authors:  Gonzalo Baron-Esquivias; Jesús Martínez-Alday; Alfonso Martín; Angel Moya; Roberto García-Civera; M Paz López-Chicharro; María Martín-Mendez; Carmen del Arco; Pedro Laguna
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score.

Authors:  Furio Colivicchi; Fabrizio Ammirati; Domenico Melina; Vincenzo Guido; Giuseppe Imperoli; Massimo Santini
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Management of syncope in the Emergency Department: a single hospital observational case series based on the application of European Society of Cardiology Guidelines.

Authors:  Frances McCarthy; C Geraldine McMahon; Una Geary; Patrick K Plunkett; Rose Anne Kenny; Conal J Cunningham
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Hospital admissions with head injury following publication of NICE guidance.

Authors:  S Goodacre
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  13 in total

1.  The investigation of syncope: strengths and weaknesses of emergency medicine.

Authors:  Karl Werdan
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Renal nerve stimulation for treatment of neurocardiogenic syncope: a review from perspective of commercialization potential.

Authors:  B O'Brien; H Zafar; F Sharif
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  [Syncope update 2018].

Authors:  Carsten W Israel; Malte Meesmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-06

4.  Unanswered questions.

Authors:  Carl-Albrecht Haensch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Consider European guidelines for syncope.

Authors:  Rolf R Diehl
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 6.  [Syncope--algorithms for emergency medicine].

Authors:  F Sayk; M J Berndt
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  The prevalence and prognostic significance of near syncope and syncope: a prospective study of 395 cases in an emergency department (the SPEED study).

Authors:  Yvonne Greve; Felicitas Geier; Steffen Popp; Thomas Bertsch; Katrin Singler; Florian Meier; Alexander Smolarsky; Harald Mang; Christian Müller; Michael Christ
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 8.  Clinical evaluation and risk stratification in patients with syncope.

Authors:  T Koenig; D Duncker; S Hohmann; C Schroeder; H Oswald; C Veltmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  [Differential diagnostics of unclear syncope].

Authors:  T Seewöster; F Lindemann; G Hindricks
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Carbon monoxide poisoning following use of a water pipe/hookah.

Authors:  Joscha von Rappard; Melanie Schönenberger; Lorenz Bärlocher
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.