Literature DB >> 22334808

A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP.

Eric D Powell1, Peter C Gay, Joseph M Ojile, Mikhail Litinski, Atul Malhotra.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that early intervention with an auto bilevel device would improve treatment adherence compared to CPAP among OSA patients with a poor initial experience with lab-based CPAP titration.
METHODS: Patients with a poor initial CPAP experience were recruited for this parallel group, randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study. After an in-lab titration, patients were randomized with either an auto-bilevel device or CPAP. Treatment adherence and functioning were assessed at 90 days.
RESULTS: We enrolled 51 subjects, with 47 completing the protocol. Groups were equally matched for gender, age, education, and OSA severity. There was no significant difference in the proportion of compliant subjects (≥ 4 h/night) between the auto bilevel and CPAP groups (62% vs. 54%; p = 0.624) after 90 days of use. Functional outcomes significantly improved in both groups during treatment use (p < 0.001) but did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in adherence between the auto bilevel and CPAP groups in this study. Patients with a poor initial CPAP exposure may still achieve an acceptable long-term clinical outcome. Both groups demonstrated comparably significant improvements in functional outcomes, sleepiness, and fatigue complaints over the treatment period. CLINICAL TRIALS INFORMATION: NCT00635206 ClinicalTrials.gov

Entities:  

Keywords:  Treatment compliance; bilevel positive airway pressure; continuous positive airway pressure; lung; obstructive sleep apnea

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22334808      PMCID: PMC3266339          DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.1658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med        ISSN: 1550-9389            Impact factor:   4.062


  16 in total

1.  Randomizing research participants: promoting balance and concealment in small samples.

Authors:  Ellyn E Matthews; Paul F Cook; Masaka Terada; Mark S Aloia
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Night-to-night variability in CPAP use over the first three months of treatment.

Authors:  T E Weaver; N B Kribbs; A I Pack; L R Kline; D K Chugh; G Maislin; P L Smith; A R Schwartz; N M Schubert; K A Gillen; D F Dinges
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  A long-term randomized, cross-over comparison of auto-titrating and standard nasal continuous airway pressure.

Authors:  D W Hudgel; C Fung
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Treatment adherence and outcomes in flexible vs standard continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

Authors:  Mark S Aloia; Michael Stanchina; J Todd Arnedt; Atul Malhotra; Richard P Millman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Determinants of nasal CPAP compliance.

Authors:  Carl J Stepnowsky; Matthew R Marler; Sonia Ancoli-Israel
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing continuous positive airway pressure with a novel bilevel pressure system for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  Peter C Gay; Daniel L Herold; Eric J Olson
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Reliability and factor analysis of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Sleep during titration predicts continuous positive airway pressure compliance.

Authors:  Christopher L Drake; Ryan Day; David Hudgel; Yevgeniy Stefadu; Mary Parks; Mary Lou Syron; Thomas Roth
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 9.  Pressure modification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Ian Smith; Toby J Lasserson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

10.  Early CPAP use identifies subsequent adherence to CPAP therapy.

Authors:  Rohit Budhiraja; Sairam Parthasarathy; Christopher L Drake; Thomas Roth; Imran Sharief; Pooja Budhiraja; Victoria Saunders; David W Hudgel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.849

View more
  16 in total

1.  The quest to improve CPAP adherence--PAP potpourri is not the answer.

Authors:  Stuart F Quan; Karim M Awad; Rohit Budhiraja; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  The Quest to Improve CPAP Adherence--PAP Potpourri is Still Not the Answer, but more research is needed.

Authors:  Stuart F Quan; Karim M Awad; Rohit Budhiraja; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Driving on "auto": hands-on is more effective than hands-free.

Authors:  Barry Krakow; Victor A Ulibarri; Jessica N Sanchez; Shara Kikta; Natalia McIver; Dominic Melendrez
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 4.  New developments in the use of positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Lucas M Donovan; Schafer Boeder; Atul Malhotra; Sanjay R Patel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Efficacy of Bilevel-auto Treatment in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Not Responsive to or Intolerant of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation.

Authors:  Annalisa Carlucci; Piero Ceriana; Marco Mancini; Serena Cirio; Paola Pierucci; Nadia D'Artavilla Lupo; Felice Gadaleta; Elisa Morrone; Francesco Fanfulla
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Positive Airway Pressure: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment.

Authors:  Susheel P Patil; Indu A Ayappa; Sean M Caples; R Joh Kimoff; Sanjay R Patel; Christopher G Harrod
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Examining the mechanism of action of a new device using oral pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Richard J Schwab; C Kim; Lawrence Siegel; B T Keenan; Jed Black; Mehran Farid-Moayer; Jonathan Podmore; Matt Vaska
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  A multicenter evaluation of oral pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Ian M Colrain; Jed Black; Lawrence C Siegel; Richard K Bogan; Philip M Becker; Mehran Farid-Moayer; Rochelle Goldberg; D Alan Lankford; Andrew N Goldberg; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 9.  Adult obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Amy S Jordan; David G McSharry; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Pressure-Relief Features of Fixed and Autotitrating Continuous Positive Airway Pressure May Impair Their Efficacy: Evaluation with a Respiratory Bench Model.

Authors:  Kaixian Zhu; Sami Aouf; Gabriel Roisman; Pierre Escourrou
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.