Literature DB >> 22333986

Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes of subfertile women after infertility treatment and in naturally conceived pregnancies.

Kaisa Raatikainen1, Paula Kuivasaari-Pirinen, Maritta Hippeläinen, Seppo Heinonen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnancies achieved through assisted reproductive technology (ART) could either be due to the technology or to the underlying subfertility or to both. To address this issue, we compared the pregnancy outcomes of singletons conceived naturally after a long time to pregnancy (TTP) with those of ART pregnancies.
METHODS: We analysed an existing birth database. Altogether 428 ART pregnancies were compared with 928 spontaneously conceived pregnancies with TTP of 2 years or more, during the period 1989-2007 at Kuopio University Hospital, Finland. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: Between treated and untreated subfertile women no significant differences were found in the rates of Caesarean sections (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.89-1.64), preterm births (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.81-2.03), small for gestational age (SGA) birthweight (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.65-1.39), need of neonatal intensive care (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.88-1.88) or low Apgar scores (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.47-3.04). However, compared with pregnancies of women with TTP 0-6 months, ART pregnancies had significantly increased risks of preterm or very preterm birth, low birthweight and need of neonatal intensive care.
CONCLUSIONS: The risks of preterm birth, SGA, need for neonatal intensive care and low Apgar scores were not significantly different between subfertile women who conceived spontaneously and those who conceived through ART indicating that maternal factors relating to subfertility and not only infertility treatment are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22333986     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  25 in total

Review 1.  FSH Actions and Pregnancy: Looking Beyond Ovarian FSH Receptors.

Authors:  Julie A W Stilley; Deborah L Segaloff
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  Initial maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies achieved after assisted reproductive technology are higher after preimplantation genetic screening and after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Elie Hobeika; Sonali Singh; Shaveta Malik; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; David B Seifer; Amy T Sparks; Paul C Lin; Kevin J Doody; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Logan G Spector
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Are assisted reproduction technologies associated with categorical or dimensional aspects of psychopathology in childhood, adolescence or early adulthood? Results from a Danish prospective nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  T Klausen; K Juul Hansen; P Munk-Jørgensen; C Mohr-Jensen
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 5.  Cardiometabolic health of children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Edwina H Yeung; Charlotte Druschel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Bruce Cohen; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.142

8.  Is the wrong question being asked in infertility research?

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein; Milton Kotelchuck; Hafsatou Diop; Howard Cabral; Eugene R Declercq
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  ART and health: clinical outcomes and insights on molecular mechanisms from rodent studies.

Authors:  S K Feuer; L Camarano; P F Rinaudo
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies following IVF treatment: a hospital-based comparative study.

Authors:  Cuifang Fan; Yanmei Sun; Jing Yang; Jinping Ye; Suqing Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.