Literature DB >> 22333664

Systemic immunosuppression in ocular surface stem cell transplantation: results of a 10-year experience.

Edward J Holland1, Gautham Mogilishetty, Heather M Skeens, David B Hair, Kristiana D Neff, Joseph M Biber, Clara C Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the systemic immunosuppression protocol used at the Cincinnati Eye Institute and University of Cincinnati, and to evaluate the success, tolerability, and side effects of systemic immunosuppression in patients undergoing ocular surface stem cell transplantation (OSST).
METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients who had OSST from 1997 to 2007 and received follow-up for systemic immunosuppression at the Cincinnati Eye Institute. Patients were analyzed for demographics, systemic immunosuppression exposure, ocular surface stability, efficacy, and toxicity variables.
RESULTS: A total of 225 eyes from 136 patients with a mean age of 43.6 years (range, 8.9-80.6 years) underwent OSST with systemic immunosuppression. The most common systemic immunosuppression regimen consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and a short course (1-3 months) of prednisone (102/136 patients, 75%). Prophylactic valganciclovir and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (dapsone if sulfa allergy was present) were also used. Mean duration of immunosuppression was 42.1 months (range, 3.6-128 months) and mean follow-up time after OSST was 53.9 months (range, 3.6-147.3 months). At the patients' final follow-up visit, 105/136 patients (77.2%) had a stable ocular surface. There were 3 severe adverse events in 2 patients (1.5%) and 21 minor adverse events in 19 patients (14.0%). Of the 21 patients with adverse events, 10 (47.6%) had systemic comorbidities at initial presentation.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevention of graft rejection with the use of systemic immunosuppression after OSST is crucial and should be approached with the same rigor as in solid organ transplantation. With appropriate long-term monitoring by the cornea specialist and transplant physician, the risk of irreversible toxicity at current dosages of systemic immunosuppression in this population is minimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22333664     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8b0c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  12 in total

Review 1.  Contact Lens-induced Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.

Authors:  Jennifer Rossen; Alec Amram; Behrad Milani; Dongwook Park; Jennifer Harthan; Charlotte Joslin; Timothy McMahon; Ali Djalilian
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Intravenous immunoglobulin for antibody-mediated keratolimbal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Victoria Squissato; Jeffrey Schiff; Clara C Chan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-25

3.  Late Acute Rejection After Allograft Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Evidence for Long-Term Donor Survival.

Authors:  Medi Eslani; Zeeshan Haq; Asadolah Movahedan; Adam Moss; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Gautham Mogilishetty; Edward J Holland; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 4.  Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in corneal transplantation-A review.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Mario Montana; Samuel M Santosa; Irene D Isjwara; Yu-Hui Huang; Kyu-Yeon Han; Christopher O'Neil; Ashley Wang; Maria Soledad Cortina; Jose de la Cruz; Qiang Zhou; Mark I Rosenblatt; Jin-Hong Chang; Dimitri T Azar
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 5.  Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Han Peng; Robert M Lavker
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Simple limbal epithelial transplantation: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Catherine J Jackson; Inger T Myklebust Ernø; Håkon Ringstad; Kim A Tønseth; Darlene A Dartt; Tor P Utheim
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.940

7.  Long-Term Results of Cultured Limbal Stem Cell Versus Limbal Tissue Transplantation in Stage III Limbal Deficiency.

Authors:  Vincent M Borderie; Djida Ghoubay; Cristina Georgeon; Marie Borderie; Céline de Sousa; Anne Legendre; Hélène Rouard
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  Understanding Immune Responses to Surgical Transplant Procedures in Stevens Johnsons Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Matias Soifer; Hazem M Mousa; Robert B Levy; Victor L Perez
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 9.  Clinical Aspects of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis With Severe Ocular Complications in Brazil.

Authors:  Tais Hitomi Wakamatsu; Myrna Serapião Dos Santos; Telma Pereira Barreiro; Ana Estela Besteti Pires Ponce Sant'Anna; Fabíola Murta; Alexandre Xavier da Costa; Leonardo Guedes C Marculino; Rafael Jorge Alves de Alcântara; Charles Costa de Farias; José Álvaro Pereira Gomes
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-18

Review 10.  Limbal stem cell transplantation: current perspectives.

Authors:  Marwan Raymond Atallah; Sotiria Palioura; Victor L Perez; Guillermo Amescua
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.