PURPOSE: To analyze the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of isolates from fungal keratitis to natamycin and voriconazole and to assess the relationship between organism, MIC, and clinical outcome. METHODS: Data were collected as part of a randomized, controlled, double-masked clinical trial. Main outcome measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, infiltrate/scar size, time to reepithelialization, and perforation. Speciation and analysis of MIC to natamycin and voriconazole were done according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards. The relationship between MIC and organism, organism and outcome measure, and each outcome measure and MIC were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 120 samples obtained in the trial, 84 isolates had an identifiable organism and were available for further analyses. Fusarium spp and Aspergillus spp were the most commonly isolated organisms. MIC was significantly different across the groups of organisms (P = 0.0001). A higher MIC was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of perforation [odds ratio (OR), 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-4.04; P = 0.04]. There was no significant association between MIC and 3-week visual acuity (OR, 0.058; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.13; P = 0.11), 3-month visual acuity (OR, 0.01; 95% CI,-0.08 to 1.04; P = 0.79), 3-week infiltrate/scar size (OR, 0.12, 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.27; P = 0.10), 3-month infiltrate/scar size (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.25; P = 0.09), or time to reepithelialization (hazards ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.98-1.45; P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: A higher MIC was associated with an increased odds of perforation. The results of this study suggest that resistance to antifungal medication may be associated with worse outcomes in fungal keratitis.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To analyze the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of isolates from fungal keratitis to natamycin and voriconazole and to assess the relationship between organism, MIC, and clinical outcome. METHODS: Data were collected as part of a randomized, controlled, double-masked clinical trial. Main outcome measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, infiltrate/scar size, time to reepithelialization, and perforation. Speciation and analysis of MIC to natamycin and voriconazole were done according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards. The relationship between MIC and organism, organism and outcome measure, and each outcome measure and MIC were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 120 samples obtained in the trial, 84 isolates had an identifiable organism and were available for further analyses. Fusarium spp and Aspergillusspp were the most commonly isolated organisms. MIC was significantly different across the groups of organisms (P = 0.0001). A higher MIC was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of perforation [odds ratio (OR), 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-4.04; P = 0.04]. There was no significant association between MIC and 3-week visual acuity (OR, 0.058; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.13; P = 0.11), 3-month visual acuity (OR, 0.01; 95% CI,-0.08 to 1.04; P = 0.79), 3-week infiltrate/scar size (OR, 0.12, 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.27; P = 0.10), 3-month infiltrate/scar size (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.25; P = 0.09), or time to reepithelialization (hazards ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.98-1.45; P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: A higher MIC was associated with an increased odds of perforation. The results of this study suggest that resistance to antifungal medication may be associated with worse outcomes in fungal keratitis.
Authors: Brett L Shapiro; Prajna Lalitha; Allison R Loh; Annette W Fothergill; Namperumalsamy V Prajna; Muthiah Srinivasan; Amit Kabra; Jaya Chidambaram; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: A K Leck; P A Thomas; M Hagan; J Kaliamurthy; E Ackuaku; M John; M J Newman; F S Codjoe; J A Opintan; C M Kalavathy; V Essuman; C A N Jesudasan; G J Johnson Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: M Srinivasan; C A Gonzales; C George; V Cevallos; J M Mascarenhas; B Asokan; J Wilkins; G Smolin; J P Whitcher Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: N Venkatesh Prajna; Prajna Lalitha; Revathi Rajaraman; Tiruvengada Krishnan; Anita Raghavan; Muthiah Srinivasan; Kieran S O'Brien; Michael Zegans; Stephen D McLeod; Nisha R Acharya; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Catherine E Oldenburg; N Venkatesh Prajna; Abdou Amza; Allison Loh; Nisha R Acharya; Mark J Mannis; Thomas M Lietman Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: N Venkatesh Prajna; Tiruvengada Krishnan; Revathi Rajaraman; Sushila Patel; Muthiah Srinivasan; Manoranjan Das; Kathryn J Ray; Kieran S O'Brien; Catherine E Oldenburg; Stephen D McLeod; Michael E Zegans; Travis C Porco; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Prajna Lalitha; Catherine Q Sun; N Venkatesh Prajna; Rajarathinam Karpagam; Manoharan Geetha; Kieran S O'Brien; Vicky Cevallos; Stephen D McLeod; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: N Venkatesh Prajna; Tiruvengada Krishnan; Jeena Mascarenhas; Revathi Rajaraman; Lalitha Prajna; Muthiah Srinivasan; Anita Raghavan; Catherine E Oldenburg; Kathryn J Ray; Michael E Zegans; Stephen D McLeod; Travis C Porco; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Catherine Q Sun; N Venkatesh Prajna; Tiruvengada Krishnan; Jeena Mascarenhas; Revathi Rajaraman; Muthiah Srinivasan; Anita Raghavan; Kieran S O'Brien; Kathryn J Ray; Stephen D McLeod; Travis C Porco; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Catherine Q Sun; Prajna Lalitha; N Venkatesh Prajna; Rajarathinam Karpagam; Manoharan Geetha; Kieran S O'Brien; Catherine E Oldenburg; Kathryn J Ray; Stephen D McLeod; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 12.079