BACKGROUND: Chronic exposure to particulate air pollution may accelerate cognitive decline in older adults, although data on this association are limited. Our objective was to examine long-term exposure to particulate matter (PM) air pollution, both coarse ([PM 2.5-10 μm in diameter [PM(2.5-10)]) and fine (PM <2.5 μm in diameter [PM(2.5)]), in relation to cognitive decline. METHODS: The study population comprised the Nurses' Health Study Cognitive Cohort, which included 19,409 US women aged 70 to 81 years. We used geographic information system-based spatiotemporal smoothing models to estimate recent (1 month) and long-term (7-14 years) exposures to PM(2.5-10), and PM(2.5) preceding baseline cognitive testing (1995-2001) of participants residing in the contiguous United States. We used generalized estimating equation regression to estimate differences in the rate of cognitive decline across levels of PM(2.5-10) and PM(2.5) exposures. The main outcome measure was cognition, via validated telephone assessments, administered 3 times at approximately 2-year intervals, including tests of general cognition, verbal memory, category fluency, working memory, and attention. RESULTS: Higher levels of long-term exposure to both PM(2.5-10) and PM(2.5) were associated with significantly faster cognitive decline. Two-year decline on a global score was 0.020 (95% CI, -0.032 to -0.008) standard units worse per 10 μg/m(3) increment in PM(2.5-10) exposure and 0.018 (95% CI, -0.035 to -0.002) units worse per 10 μg/m(3) increment in PM(2.5) exposure. These differences in cognitive trajectory were similar to those between women in our cohort who were approximately 2 years apart in age, indicating that the effect of a 10-μg/m(3) increment in long-term PM exposure is cognitively equivalent to aging by approximately 2 years. CONCLUSION: Long-term exposure to PM(2.5-10) and PM(2.5) at levels typically experienced by many individuals in the United States is associated with significantly worse cognitive decline in older women.
BACKGROUND: Chronic exposure to particulate air pollution may accelerate cognitive decline in older adults, although data on this association are limited. Our objective was to examine long-term exposure to particulate matter (PM) air pollution, both coarse ([PM 2.5-10 μm in diameter [PM(2.5-10)]) and fine (PM <2.5 μm in diameter [PM(2.5)]), in relation to cognitive decline. METHODS: The study population comprised the Nurses' Health Study Cognitive Cohort, which included 19,409 US women aged 70 to 81 years. We used geographic information system-based spatiotemporal smoothing models to estimate recent (1 month) and long-term (7-14 years) exposures to PM(2.5-10), and PM(2.5) preceding baseline cognitive testing (1995-2001) of participants residing in the contiguous United States. We used generalized estimating equation regression to estimate differences in the rate of cognitive decline across levels of PM(2.5-10) and PM(2.5) exposures. The main outcome measure was cognition, via validated telephone assessments, administered 3 times at approximately 2-year intervals, including tests of general cognition, verbal memory, category fluency, working memory, and attention. RESULTS: Higher levels of long-term exposure to both PM(2.5-10) and PM(2.5) were associated with significantly faster cognitive decline. Two-year decline on a global score was 0.020 (95% CI, -0.032 to -0.008) standard units worse per 10 μg/m(3) increment in PM(2.5-10) exposure and 0.018 (95% CI, -0.035 to -0.002) units worse per 10 μg/m(3) increment in PM(2.5) exposure. These differences in cognitive trajectory were similar to those between women in our cohort who were approximately 2 years apart in age, indicating that the effect of a 10-μg/m(3) increment in long-term PM exposure is cognitively equivalent to aging by approximately 2 years. CONCLUSION: Long-term exposure to PM(2.5-10) and PM(2.5) at levels typically experienced by many individuals in the United States is associated with significantly worse cognitive decline in older women.
Authors: P A Scherr; M S Albert; H H Funkenstein; N R Cook; C H Hennekens; L G Branch; L R White; J O Taylor; D A Evans Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1988-11 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Melinda C Power; Marc G Weisskopf; Stacey E Alexeeff; Brent A Coull; Avron Spiro; Joel Schwartz Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Elena Colicino; Giulia Giuliano; Melinda C Power; Johanna Lepeule; Elissa H Wilker; Pantel Vokonas; Kasey J M Brennan; Serena Fossati; Mirjam Hoxha; Avron Spiro; Marc G Weisskopf; Joel Schwartz; Andrea A Baccarelli Journal: Environ Int Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Christen L Mumaw; Shannon Levesque; Constance McGraw; Sarah Robertson; Selita Lucas; Jillian E Stafflinger; Matthew J Campen; Pamela Hall; Jeffrey P Norenberg; Tamara Anderson; Amie K Lund; Jacob D McDonald; Andrew K Ottens; Michelle L Block Journal: FASEB J Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Elissa H Wilker; Sarah R Preis; Alexa S Beiser; Philip A Wolf; Rhoda Au; Itai Kloog; Wenyuan Li; Joel Schwartz; Petros Koutrakis; Charles DeCarli; Sudha Seshadri; Murray A Mittleman Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Natalie C DuPré; Jaime E Hart; Michelle D Holmes; Elizabeth M Poole; Peter James; Peter Kraft; Francine Laden; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Karin Fehsel; Tamara Schikowski; Michaela Jänner; Anke Hüls; Mohammed Voussoughi; Thomas Schulte; Andrea Vierkötter; Tom Teichert; Christian Herder; Dorothea Sugiri; Ursula Krämer; Christian Luckhaus Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 3.575