BACKGROUND: This study tested in children with cerebral palsy (CP) whether motor habilitation resembles motor learning. METHODS: Twelve children with hemiplegic CP ages 5 to 12 years with moderate to severe motor impairments underwent a 16-session robot-mediated planar therapy program to improve upper limb reach, with a focus on shoulder and elbow movements. Participants were trained to execute point-to-point movements (with robot assistance) with the affected arm and were evaluated (without robot assistance) in trained (point-to-point) and untrained (circle-drawing) conditions. Outcomes were measured at baseline, midpoint, immediately after the program, and 1 month postcompletion. Outcome measures were the Fugl-Meyer (FM), Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores; parent questionnaire; and robot-based kinematic metrics. To assess whether learning best characterizes motor habilitation in CP, the authors quantified (a) improvement on trained tasks at completion of training (acquisition) and 1 month following completion (retention) and (b) quantified generalization of improvement to untrained tasks. RESULTS: After robotic intervention, the authors found significant gains in the FM, QUEST, and parent questionnaire. Robot-based evaluations demonstrated significant improvement in trained movements and that improvement was sustained at follow-up. Furthermore, children improved their performance in untrained movements indicating generalization. CONCLUSIONS: Motor habilitation in CP exhibits some traits of motor learning. Optimal treatment may not require an extensive repertoire of tasks but rather a select set to promote generalization.
BACKGROUND: This study tested in children with cerebral palsy (CP) whether motor habilitation resembles motor learning. METHODS: Twelve children with hemiplegic CP ages 5 to 12 years with moderate to severe motor impairments underwent a 16-session robot-mediated planar therapy program to improve upper limb reach, with a focus on shoulder and elbow movements. Participants were trained to execute point-to-point movements (with robot assistance) with the affected arm and were evaluated (without robot assistance) in trained (point-to-point) and untrained (circle-drawing) conditions. Outcomes were measured at baseline, midpoint, immediately after the program, and 1 month postcompletion. Outcome measures were the Fugl-Meyer (FM), Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores; parent questionnaire; and robot-based kinematic metrics. To assess whether learning best characterizes motor habilitation in CP, the authors quantified (a) improvement on trained tasks at completion of training (acquisition) and 1 month following completion (retention) and (b) quantified generalization of improvement to untrained tasks. RESULTS: After robotic intervention, the authors found significant gains in the FM, QUEST, and parent questionnaire. Robot-based evaluations demonstrated significant improvement in trained movements and that improvement was sustained at follow-up. Furthermore, children improved their performance in untrained movements indicating generalization. CONCLUSIONS: Motor habilitation in CP exhibits some traits of motor learning. Optimal treatment may not require an extensive repertoire of tasks but rather a select set to promote generalization.
Authors: Leanne Sakzewski; Jenny Ziviani; David F Abbott; Richard A L Macdonell; Graeme D Jackson; Roslyn N Boyd Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: L Dipietro; H I Krebs; B T Volpe; J Stein; C Bever; S T Mernoff; S E Fasoli; N Hogan Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: F Frascarelli; L Masia; G Di Rosa; P Cappa; M Petrarca; E Castelli; H I Krebs Journal: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.874
Authors: Brandon Rohrer; Susan Fasoli; Hermano Igo Krebs; Richard Hughes; Bruce Volpe; Walter R Frontera; Joel Stein; Neville Hogan Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Hermano I Krebs; Barbara Ladenheim; Christopher Hippolyte; Linda Monterroso; Joelle Mast Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Roslyn N Boyd; Louise E Mitchell; Sarah T James; Jenny Ziviani; Leanne Sakzewski; Anthony Smith; Stephen Rose; Ross Cunnington; Koa Whittingham; Robert S Ware; Tracey A Comans; Paul A Scuffham Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Qi L Xiong; Xiao Y Wu; Jun Yao; Theresa Sukal-Moulton; Nong Xiao; Lin Chen; Xiao L Zheng; Yuan Liu; Wen S Hou Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 4.003