Literature DB >> 22330978

Hearing loss, hyperacusis, or tinnitus: what is modeled in animal research?

Jos J Eggermont1.   

Abstract

Animal models of tinnitus require a behavioral correlate thereof. Various conditioned response methods and gap-startle reflex methods are in use and the outcomes generally correspond with putative electrophysiological substrates of tinnitus. However, for salicylate-induced tinnitus there is discordance between the behavioral and electrophysiological test results. As a result, it is not clear what the various tests are reflecting. A review of the, mostly sub-cortical, neural circuits that underlie the behavioral responses suggests that cortical electrophysiological correlates do not necessarily have to correspond with behavioral ones. Human objective correlates of tinnitus point heavily into cortical network, but not just auditory cortex, correlates of tinnitus. Furthermore, the synaptic mechanisms underlying spontaneous firing rate changes may be different from those involved in driven neural activity.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22330978     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  47 in total

1.  Is noise-induced cochlear neuropathy key to the generation of hyperacusis or tinnitus?

Authors:  Ann E Hickox; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  No longer falling on deaf ears: mechanisms of degeneration and regeneration of cochlear ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Guoqiang Wan; Gabriel Corfas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  [Newest therapeutic approaches for chronic tinnitus].

Authors:  G Hesse
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Tinnitus Correlates with Downregulation of Cortical Glutamate Decarboxylase 65 Expression But Not Auditory Cortical Map Reorganization.

Authors:  Asako Miyakawa; Weihua Wang; Sung-Jin Cho; Delia Li; Sungchil Yang; Shaowen Bao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Tinnitus and underlying brain mechanisms.

Authors:  Alexander V Galazyuk; Jeffrey J Wenstrup; Mohamed A Hamid
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 6.  Is the din really harmless? Long-term effects of non-traumatic noise on the adult auditory system.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Jean-Marc Edeline; Florian Occelli; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications.

Authors:  James A Henry; Larry E Roberts; Donald M Caspary; Sarah M Theodoroff; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 8.  Tinnitus: perspectives from human neuroimaging.

Authors:  Ana Belén Elgoyhen; Berthold Langguth; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 9.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Diminished cortical inhibition in an aging mouse model of chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Daniel A Llano; Jeremy Turner; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.