Literature DB >> 22330870

Validity of the modified richmond agitation-sedation scale for use in sedated, mechanically ventilated Swine.

Katrina N Leyden1, Sandra K Hanneman.   

Abstract

A valid and reliable scale for assessing level of sedation would facilitate appropriate sedation management in a porcine intensive care unit (ICU) model. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is used often for human ICU patients. The purpose of this study was to estimate the content validity of the modified RASS for use in sedated, mechanically ventilated swine. The modified RASS includes descriptors specific for swine. A content validity assessment form was developed with 4 items and 5 response choices to assess the modified RASS for relevancy, sufficiency, clarity, and representativeness. The modified RASS and content validity assessment form were emailed to 23 veterinarians with experience in the care of swine or other large animals; participants judged the extent to which the modified RASS is valid for assessing sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill swine. The criterion for acceptable validity evidence was a content validity index (CVI) of 0.80 or greater. Eight (67%) of 12 veterinarians who responded to the invitation to participate completed the assessment form. The item CVI varied from 0.50 to 0.88; scale CVI was 0.66. Because these values did not meet the a priori criterion, we concluded that the modified RASS does not have sufficient evidence of content validity for use with swine. The reliability of the modified RASS will be tested in the porcine ICU model, and experience with its use in swine will inform refinement of the scale descriptors for repeat assessment of content validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22330870      PMCID: PMC3276968     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  24 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult.

Authors:  Judith Jacobi; Gilles L Fraser; Douglas B Coursin; Richard R Riker; Dorrie Fontaine; Eric T Wittbrodt; Donald B Chalfin; Michael F Masica; H Scott Bjerke; William M Coplin; David W Crippen; Barry D Fuchs; Ruth M Kelleher; Paul E Marik; Stanley A Nasraway; Michael J Murray; William T Peruzzi; Philip D Lumb
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Determination and quantification of content validity.

Authors:  M R Lynn
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Sedation assessment in critically ill adults.

Authors:  J W Devlin; G L Fraser; S Kanji; R R Riker
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Curtis N Sessler; Mark S Gosnell; Mary Jo Grap; Gretchen M Brophy; Pam V O'Neal; Kimberly A Keane; Eljim P Tesoro; R K Elswick
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone.

Authors:  M A Ramsay; T M Savege; B R Simpson; R Goodwin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-06-22

7.  Administration of sedatives and level of sedation: comparative evaluation via the Sedation-Agitation Scale and the Bispectral Index.

Authors:  Marjolein de Wit; Scott K Epstein
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Left ventricular systolic performance in failing heart improved acutely by left ventricular reshaping.

Authors:  Kun-lun He; Juichiro Shimizu; Geng-hua Yi; Anguo Gu; M Abul Kashem; Deborah L Crabbe; Sulli Popilskis; Ed X Wu; William P Santamore; David Melvin; Jie Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Feasibility of a porcine adult intensive care model.

Authors:  Sandra K Hanneman; Fred J Clubb; Kathleen McKay; Gil Costas
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.982

10.  Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).

Authors:  E Wesley Ely; Brenda Truman; Ayumi Shintani; Jason W W Thomason; Arthur P Wheeler; Sharon Gordon; Joseph Francis; Theodore Speroff; Shiva Gautam; Richard Margolin; Curtis N Sessler; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Utility of the Swine Model to Assess Biological Rhythms and Their Characteristics during Different Stages of Residence in a Simulated Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Katrina N Leyden; Sandra K Hanneman; Nikhil S Padhye; Michael H Smolensky; Duck-Hee Kang; Diana Shu-Lian Chow
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Assessing the Content Validity of the Revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS 2018).

Authors:  Meredith G Harris; Caley Tapp; Urska Arnautovska; Tim Coombs; Rosemary Dickson; Mick James; Jon Painter; Mark Smith; Angela Jury; Jennifer Lai; Philip M Burgess
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.