OBJECTIVE: Respiratory complications account for a major cause of morbidity and mortality in subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) due to paralysis of the expiratory muscles and the consequent inability to generate effective cough. We demonstrated previously that effective cough can be restored in SCI via spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with disc leads positioned on the lower thoracic and upper lumbar spinal cord via laminotomy incisions. In this study, the effectiveness of wire leads, which can be placed using minimally invasive techniques, to activate the expiratory muscles was evaluated. DESIGN: Animal study. SETTING: Research laboratory. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 8). INTERVENTIONS: In separate trials, disc and wire leads were inserted onto the dorsal epidural space at the T9, T11, and L1 spinal cord levels. Effects of electrical stimulation with disc, single wire, and two wire leads placed in parallel were compared. OUTCOME MEASURES: Airway pressure generation following stimulation with disc and various configurations of wire leads were compared. RESULTS: Several different configurations of wire leads resulted in airway pressures that were similar to those generated with monopolar stimulation with disc leads (MSDLs). For example, combined monopolar stimulation with parallel wire leads at the T9 + T11 and T9 + L1 levels resulted in airway pressures that were 103.5 ± 6.4 and 101.9 ± 7.0%, respectively, of those achieved with MSDL. Bipolar stimulation with parallel wire leads at T9-T11 and T9-L1 resulted in airway pressures that were 94.2 ± 3.4 and 96.8 ± 5.0%, respectively, of the pressures achieved with MSDL. Other wire configurations were also evaluated, but were generally less effective. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that specific configurations of wire leads, which can be placed via minimally invasive techniques, result in comparable activation of the expiratory muscles compared to disc leads and may be a useful technique to restore cough in persons with SCI.
OBJECTIVE: Respiratory complications account for a major cause of morbidity and mortality in subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) due to paralysis of the expiratory muscles and the consequent inability to generate effective cough. We demonstrated previously that effective cough can be restored in SCI via spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with disc leads positioned on the lower thoracic and upper lumbar spinal cord via laminotomy incisions. In this study, the effectiveness of wire leads, which can be placed using minimally invasive techniques, to activate the expiratory muscles was evaluated. DESIGN: Animal study. SETTING: Research laboratory. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 8). INTERVENTIONS: In separate trials, disc and wire leads were inserted onto the dorsal epidural space at the T9, T11, and L1 spinal cord levels. Effects of electrical stimulation with disc, single wire, and two wire leads placed in parallel were compared. OUTCOME MEASURES: Airway pressure generation following stimulation with disc and various configurations of wire leads were compared. RESULTS: Several different configurations of wire leads resulted in airway pressures that were similar to those generated with monopolar stimulation with disc leads (MSDLs). For example, combined monopolar stimulation with parallel wire leads at the T9 + T11 and T9 + L1 levels resulted in airway pressures that were 103.5 ± 6.4 and 101.9 ± 7.0%, respectively, of those achieved with MSDL. Bipolar stimulation with parallel wire leads at T9-T11 and T9-L1 resulted in airway pressures that were 94.2 ± 3.4 and 96.8 ± 5.0%, respectively, of the pressures achieved with MSDL. Other wire configurations were also evaluated, but were generally less effective. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that specific configurations of wire leads, which can be placed via minimally invasive techniques, result in comparable activation of the expiratory muscles compared to disc leads and may be a useful technique to restore cough in persons with SCI.
Authors: K J Burchiel; V C Anderson; F D Brown; R G Fessler; W A Friedman; S Pelofsky; R L Weiner; J Oakley; D Shatin Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1996-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Anthony F DiMarco; Robert T Geertman; Kutaiba Tabbaa; Rebecca R Polito; Krzysztof E Kowalski Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Katherine C Locke; Margo L Randelman; Daniel J Hoh; Lyandysha V Zholudeva; Michael A Lane Journal: Neural Regen Res Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 6.058
Authors: Anthony F DiMarco; Robert T Geertman; Gregory A Nemunaitis; Krzysztof E Kowalski Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.040