Literature DB >> 22328868

Calculation of the Absolute Free Energy of Binding and Related Entropies with the HSMD-TI Method: The FKBP12-L8 Complex.

Ignacio J General1, Ralitsa Dragomirova, Hagai Meirovitch.   

Abstract

The hypothetical scanning molecular dynamics (HSMD) method is used here for calculating the absolute free energy of binding, ΔA(0) of the complex of the protein FKBP12 with the ligand SB2 (also denoted L8) - a system that has been studied previously for comparing the performance of different methods. Our preliminary study suggests that considering long-range electrostatics is imperative even for a hydrophobic ligand such as L8. Therefore the system is modeled by the AMBER force field using Particle Mesh Ewald (PME). HSMD consists of three stages applied to both the ligand-solvent and ligand-protein systems. (1) A small set of system configurations (frames) is extracted from an MD trajectory. (2) The entropy of the ligand in each frame is calculated by a reconstruction procedure. (3) The contribution of water and protein to ΔA(0) is calculated for each frame by gradually increasing the ligand-environment interactions from zero to their full value using thermodynamic integration (TI). Unlike the conventional methods, the structure of the ligand is kept fixed during TI, and HSMD is thus free from the end-point problem encountered with the double annihilation method (DAM); therefore, the need for applying restraints is avoided. Furthermore, unlike the conventional methods, the entropy of the ligand and water is obtained directly as a byproduct of the simulation. In this paper, in addition to the difference in the internal entropies of the ligand in the two environments, we calculate for the first time the external entropy of the ligand, which provides a measure for the size of the active site. We obtain ΔA(0) = -10.7 ±1.0 as compared to the experimental values -10.9 and -10.6 kcal/mol. However, a protein/water system treated by periodic boundary conditions grows significantly with increasing protein size and the computation of ΔA(0) would become expensive by all methods. Therefore, we also apply HSMD to FKBP12-L8 described by the GSBP/SSBP model of Roux's group (implemented in the software CHARMM) where only part of the protein and water around the active site are considered and long-range electrostatic effects are taken into account. For comparison this model was also treated by the double decoupling method (DDM). The two methods have led to comparable results for ΔA(0) which are somewhat lower than the experimental value. The ligand was found to be more confined in the active site described by GSBP/SSBP than by PME where its entropy in solvent is larger than in the active site by 1.7 and by 5.5 kcal/mol, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22328868      PMCID: PMC3274823          DOI: 10.1021/ct2004897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  47 in total

1.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Massively parallel computation of absolute binding free energy with well-equilibrated states.

Authors:  Hideaki Fujitani; Yoshiaki Tanida; Azuma Matsuura
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-02-26

4.  Thermodynamic stability of water molecules in the bacteriorhodopsin proton channel: a molecular dynamics free energy perturbation study.

Authors:  B Roux; M Nina; R Pomès; J C Smith
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03

6.  Crystal structures of human calcineurin and the human FKBP12-FK506-calcineurin complex.

Authors:  C R Kissinger; H E Parge; D R Knighton; C T Lewis; L A Pelletier; A Tempczyk; V J Kalish; K D Tucker; R E Showalter; E W Moomaw
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A comprehensive examination of the contributions to the binding entropy of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Nidhi Singh; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-05-15

Review 8.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Comparative X-ray structures of the major binding protein for the immunosuppressant FK506 (tacrolimus) in unliganded form and in complex with FK506 and rapamycin.

Authors:  K P Wilson; M M Yamashita; M D Sintchak; S H Rotstein; M A Murcko; J Boger; J A Thomson; M J Fitzgibbon; J R Black; M A Navia
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1995-07-01

10.  Entropy and free energy of a mobile protein loop in explicit water.

Authors:  Srinath Cheluvaraja; Mihail Mihailescu; Hagai Meirovitch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  2 in total

1.  Absolute free energy of binding of avidin/biotin, revisited.

Authors:  Ignacio J General; Ralitsa Dragomirova; Hagai Meirovitch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Standard binding free energies from computer simulations: What is the best strategy?

Authors:  James C Gumbart; Benoît Roux; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 6.006

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.