| Literature DB >> 22328741 |
Samson Gwer1, Richard Idro, Gregory Fegan, Edwin Chengo, Harrun Garrashi, Steve White, Fenella J Kirkham, Charles R Newton.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the EEG and clinical profile of seizures in children with non-traumatic coma, compare seizure detection by clinical observations with that by continuous EEG, and relate EEG features to outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22328741 PMCID: PMC3329232 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300935
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Dis Child ISSN: 0003-9888 Impact factor: 3.791
Figure 1Study flowchart.
Comparison of clinical profiles between children who were monitored and those who were not
| Monitored (n=82) | Not monitored (n=352) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months), median (IQR) | 34 (25–47) | 34 (21–46) | 0.58 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 44 (54%) | 182 (55%) | |
| Female | 38 (46%) | 150 (45%) | 0.85 |
| History of seizures | 62 (76%) | 201 (79%) | 0.58 |
| Coma level (BCS) | |||
| 2 | 43 (52%) | 164 (49%) | |
| 1 | 27 (33%) | 88 (27%) | |
| 0 | 12 (15%) | 80 (24%) | 0.154 |
| Diagnosis | |||
| Cerebral malaria | 60 (73%) | 185 (56%) | |
| Bacterial meningitis | 4 (5%) | 24 (7%) | |
| Unknown encephalopathy | 17 (21%) | 123 (37%) | |
| Sepsis | 1 (1%) | 0 | <0.01 |
| Died | 10 (12%) | 81 (24%) | 0.01 |
Kruskal–Wallis equality of population test.
n=253.
BCS, Blantyre coma score.
EEG characteristics compared with outcome
| Characteristic | Category | Good outcome | Poor outcome | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background characteristics | ||||||
| Initial amplitude | Low | 10 | 13 | |||
| Medium | 34 | 10 | 0.2 | 0.1 to 0.7 | <0.01 | |
| High | 11 | 4 | 0.3 | 0.1 to 1.3 | 0.07 | |
| Final amplitude | Low | 23 | 16 | |||
| Medium | 29 | 11 | 0.6 | 0.2 to 1.4 | 0.21 | |
| High | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | ||
| Initial frequency | Theta+some delta | 7 | 3 | |||
| Delta | 48 | 23 | 1.1 | 0.3 to 4.8 | 0.9 | |
| Mainly theta/greater | 0 | 1 | 0.2 | |||
| Final frequency | Theta+some delta | 9 | 4 | |||
| Delta | 45 | 23 | 1.2 | 0.3 to 4.2 | 0.8 | |
| Mainly theta/greater | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Seizure profile | ||||||
| During admission | No seizure | 20 | 5 | |||
| Seizures | 35 | 22 | 2.5 | 0.8 to 7.9 | 0.1 | |
| During monitoring | No seizure | 41 | 13 | |||
| Seizures | 14 | 14 | 3.2 | 1.1 to 8.7 | 0.02 | |
| Seizure types | Electrographic seizures | 12 | 10 | 2.1 | 0.8 to 5.9 | 0.1 |
| Electroclinical seizures | 5 | 6 | 2.9 | 0.8 to 10.7 | 0.1 | |
Clinical seizure types and corresponding EEG seizure type
| EEG seizure type | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical seizure type | Generalised | Focal secondarily generalised | Focal |
| No clinical manifestation | 166 | 48 | 26 |
| Generalised | 27 | 12 | 0 |
| Focal secondarily generalised | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Focal | 56 | 10 | 5 |
Figure 2Individual patient seizure profiles. (A) Seizure profiles of children who survived without any apparent neurological sequelae at discharge; (B) seizure profiles of children who had gross motor deficits at discharge from hospital; (C) seizure profiles of children who died during admission. The y axis allows for two values: a floor indicating no seizure and a ceiling indicating a seizure. All values within the individual traces take on one or other of these two values throughout time which is measured in minutes since admission on the x axis. Proportionately, more children who died or had motor deficits at discharge had more seizures, indicated by repeated vertical lines representing repeated seizures, and horizontal lines on top of the individual graphs, representing individual prolonged seizures. Sz, seizure.