Hisham Mehanna1, Oladejo Olaleye, Lisa Licitra. 1. Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK. hishammehanna@googlemail.com
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is currently strong evidence supporting human papilloma virus (HPV) causation in a distinct disease entity of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), with an increasing incidence worldwide.This review aims to critically analyse whether a change in our management approaches to HPV-positive OPC is now required for this increasingly significant public health concern. RECENT FINDINGS: HPV-positive OPC appears to have increased worldwide. HPV status has a strong prognostic effect, and, in combination with smoking status, primary, and nodal stage, is useful in the risk stratification of OPC. HPV-positive OPC responds better to chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy than HPV-negative tumours, with improved survival outcomes. There remain concerns regarding the efficacy of HPV detection assays in clinical practice. HPV-negative head and neck cancer still accounts for the largest subset of patients that we treat and carries poor survival outcomes. SUMMARY: It is currently not advisable to change management for either HPV-positive or HPV-negative OPC as there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support this. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to assess the efficacy of the different treatment modalities currently available for both HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPC.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is currently strong evidence supporting human papilloma virus (HPV) causation in a distinct disease entity of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), with an increasing incidence worldwide.This review aims to critically analyse whether a change in our management approaches to HPV-positive OPC is now required for this increasingly significant public health concern. RECENT FINDINGS:HPV-positive OPC appears to have increased worldwide. HPV status has a strong prognostic effect, and, in combination with smoking status, primary, and nodal stage, is useful in the risk stratification of OPC. HPV-positive OPC responds better to chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy than HPV-negative tumours, with improved survival outcomes. There remain concerns regarding the efficacy of HPV detection assays in clinical practice. HPV-negative head and neck cancer still accounts for the largest subset of patients that we treat and carries poor survival outcomes. SUMMARY: It is currently not advisable to change management for either HPV-positive or HPV-negative OPC as there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support this. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to assess the efficacy of the different treatment modalities currently available for both HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPC.
Authors: M Vatca; J T Lucas; J Laudadio; R B D'Agostino; J D Waltonen; C A Sullivan; R Rouchard-Plasser; M Matsangou; J D Browne; K M Greven; M Porosnicu Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Ali Qureishi; Thomas Mawby; Lisa Fraser; Ketan A Shah; Henrik Møller; Stuart Winter Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-03-11 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Robbie Woods; Esther M O'Regan; Susan Kennedy; Cara Martin; John J O'Leary; Conrad Timon Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: Daniel O'Connell; Hadi Seikaly; Russell Murphy; Charles Fung; Tim Cooper; Aaron Knox; Rufus Scrimger; Jeffrey R Harris Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-04-22
Authors: Georgios Psychogios; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Abbas Agaimy; Kathrin Brunner; Elisabeth Mangold; Johannes Zenk; Heinrich Iro Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 3.411