Literature DB >> 22326141

Multi-enzyme production by pure and mixed cultures of Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts during wine fermentation.

Y Paola Maturano1, Leticia A Rodríguez Assaf, M Eugenia Toro, M Cristina Nally, Martha Vallejo, Lucía I Castellanos de Figueroa, Mariana Combina, Fabio Vazquez.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts release enzymes that are able to transform neutral compounds of grape berries into active aromatic compounds, a process that enhances the sensory attributes of wines. So far, there exists only little information about enzymatic activity in mixed cultures of Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces during grape must fermentations. The aim of the present work was to determine the ability of yeasts to produce extracellular enzymes of enological relevance (β-glucosidases, pectinases, proteases, amylases or xylanases) in pure and mixed Saccharomyces/non-Saccharomyces cultures during fermentation. Pure and mixed cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae BSc562, Hanseniaspora vinae BHv438 and Torulaspora delbrueckii BTd259 were assayed: 1% S. cerevisiae/99% H. vinae, 10% S. cerevisiae/90% H. vinae, 1% S. cerevisiae/99% T. delbrueckii and 10% S. cerevisiae/90% T. delbrueckii. Microvinifications were carried out with fresh must without pressing from Vitis vinifera L. c.v. Pedro Jiménez, an autochthonous variety from Argentina. Non-Saccharomyces species survived during 15-18days (BTd259) or until the end of the fermentation (BHv438) and influenced enzymatic profiles of mixed cultures. The results suggest that high concentrations of sugars did not affect enzymatic activity. β-Glucosidase and pectinase activities seemed to be adversely affected by an increase in ethanol: activity diminished with increasing fermentation time. Throughout the fermentation, Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces isolates assayed produced a broad range of enzymes of enological interest that catalyze hydrolysis of polymers present in grape juice. Vinifications carried out by a pure or mixed culture of BTd259 (99% of T. delbrueckii) showed the highest production of all enzymes assayed except for β-glucosidase. In mixed cultures, S. cerevisiae outgrew H. vinae, and T. delbrueckii was only detected until halfway the fermentation process. Nevertheless, their secreted enzymes could be detected throughout the fermentation process. Our results may contribute to a better understanding of the microbial interactions and the influence of some enzymes on vinification environments.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22326141     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  12 in total

1.  The expression, secretion and activity of the aspartic protease MpAPr1 in Metschnikowia pulcherrima IWBT Y1123.

Authors:  C Snyman; L W Theron; B Divol
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Metschnikowia fructicola autochthonous mixed starter on Aglianico wine volatile compounds.

Authors:  Floriana Boscaino; Elena Ionata; Francesco La Cara; Sabato Guerriero; Loredana Marcolongo; Alida Sorrentino
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Screening of enzymatic activities within different enological non-Saccharomyces yeasts.

Authors:  Rocío Escribano; Lucía González-Arenzana; Patrocinio Garijo; Carmen Berlanas; Isabel López-Alfaro; Rosa López; Ana Rosa Gutiérrez; Pilar Santamaría
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  Using wild yeasts to modulate the aroma profile of low-alcoholic meads.

Authors:  Joshua Johannes Van Mullem; Jing Zhang; Disney Ribeiro Dias; Rosane Freitas Schwan
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 5.  The Occurrence of Glycosylated Aroma Precursors in Vitis vinifera Fruit and Humulus lupulus Hop Cones and Their Roles in Wine and Beer Volatile Aroma Production.

Authors:  Andrew Caffrey; Susan E Ebeler
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-24

6.  Genome Sequence of Torulaspora delbrueckii NRRL Y-50541, Isolated from Mezcal Fermentation.

Authors:  Jorge Gomez-Angulo; Leticia Vega-Alvarado; Zazil Escalante-García; Ricardo Grande; Anne Gschaedler-Mathis; Lorena Amaya-Delgado; Javier Arrizon; Alejandro Sanchez-Flores
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-07-23

7.  Comparison of Fermentation and Wines Produced by Inoculation of Hanseniaspora vineae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jessica Lleixà; Valentina Martín; María Del C Portillo; Francisco Carrau; Gemma Beltran; Albert Mas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Microbial Resources and Enological Significance: Opportunities and Benefits.

Authors:  Leonardo Petruzzi; Vittorio Capozzi; Carmen Berbegal; Maria R Corbo; Antonio Bevilacqua; Giuseppe Spano; Milena Sinigaglia
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Characterization of pectinase activity for enology from yeasts occurring in Argentine Bonarda grape.

Authors:  María Gabriela Merín; María Carolina Martín; Kalliopi Rantsiou; Luca Cocolin; Vilma Inés Morata de Ambrosini
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 10.  Past and Future of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts: From Spoilage Microorganisms to Biotechnological Tools for Improving Wine Aroma Complexity.

Authors:  Beatriz Padilla; José V Gil; Paloma Manzanares
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.