Literature DB >> 22325733

Evaluation of gabapentin enacarbil on cardiac repolarization: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, crossover thorough QT/QTc study in healthy adults.

Dan Chen1, Ritu Lal, Katie Zomorodi, Harisha Atluri, Judy Ho, Wendy Luo, James Tovera, Daniel Bonzo, Kenneth Cundy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin enacarbil, a transported prodrug of gabapentin, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of moderate to severe restless legs syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: As part of the overall safety evaluation of gabapentin enacarbil, the present definitive QT/QTc study was conducted to assess the effects of gabapentin enacarbil on cardiac repolarization in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization E14 guidance.
METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, crossover study enrolled 54 healthy adults. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of gabapentin enacarbil 1200, 6000 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg (active control), and placebo in a randomized sequence, with treatment periods separated by a 7-day washout. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis, and continuous ECG measurements were recorded using a Holter monitor. The primary end point was the time-matched difference in individualized baseline-adjusted QTc (ddQTcIb) between gabapentin enacarbil and placebo. General tolerability was also monitored.
RESULTS: Of the 54 subjects enrolled in the study (mean [SD] age, 29.2 [10.1]; 42.6% female; mean body mass index, 25.8 [3.0]), 48 (88.9%) completed the study, and 6 were discontinued prematurely after having received ≥ 1 dose of study medication. Thus, the numbers of patients in the safety population were: gabapentin enacarbil 1200 mg, 50; gabapentin enacarbil 6000 mg, 50; moxifloxacin, 50; and placebo, 51. The maximum ddQTcIb values were 0.7 msec (upper 95% confidence limit [CL], 3.0) with gabapentin enacarbil 1200 mg; 1.3 msec (upper CL, 3.6) with gabapentin enacarbil 6000 mg; and 7.4 msec (lower CL, 5.1) with moxifloxacin. A QT-concentration relationship was reported with moxifloxacin. Gabapentin exposures were dose-proportional with gabapentin enacarbil doses of 1200 and 6000 mg. The most commonly reported adverse events with gabapentin enacarbil 6000 mg were dizziness and somnolence (60.0% and 54.0%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: In this population of healthy adults, gabapentin enacarbil at doses of 1200 and 6000 mg was not associated with QT prolongation and was generally well-tolerated.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22325733     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  7 in total

1.  The effects of active metabolites on parameter estimation in linear mixed effect models of concentration-QT analyses.

Authors:  Peter L Bonate
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Meta-analyses of dose-exposure relationships for gabapentin following oral administration of gabapentin and gabapentin enacarbil.

Authors:  Chao Chen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Gabapentin Enacarbil: A Review in Restless Legs Syndrome.

Authors:  Esther S Kim; Emma D Deeks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Gabapentin enacarbil: in patients with restless legs syndrome.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Gabapentin enacarbil extended release for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in adults.

Authors:  Ben M Thomas; Paul Farquhar-Smith
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  QT prolongation and torsades de pointes with psychotropic agents.

Authors:  Nagaraj Desai; Chilkunda Raviprakash Venkatesh; Shambu Sunil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 7.  Pain medication and long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Christoph Klivinyi; Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2018-01-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.