Literature DB >> 23743781

Meta-analyses of dose-exposure relationships for gabapentin following oral administration of gabapentin and gabapentin enacarbil.

Chao Chen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin exposure following administration of certain doses of gabapentin or its pro-drug gabapentin enacarbil has been previously reported in the literature, with variable results.
METHODS: Meta-analyses of dose-exposure relationships were conducted to maximise precision and minimise bias. Study-level mean data for gabapentin systemic exposure, in terms of bioavailable dose and steady-state average plasma concentration, were modelled as a function of daily dose. Several linear and non-linear candidate models were tested.
RESULTS: An Emax model best described the dose-exposure relationships for gabapentin. The ED50 was 3,080 mg/day for bioavailable dose or 3,370 mg/day for steady-state concentration; and the maximum exposure was 2,340 mg/day or 16.9 mg/L. For gabapentin enacarbil, a power model was most suitable, with a power of 0.925 for bioavailable dose or 0.844 for steady-state concentration. All parameters were estimated with < 20 % standard error. Simulations confirmed that these models accurately reflected the distribution of the respective data, and bootstrapping showed high precision for the estimated dose-exposure curves.
CONCLUSION: The meta-analyses addressed issues associated with between-study variability; and confirmed the highly non-linear nature of dose-exposure relationships for gabapentin and the essentially linear relationships for gabapentin enacarbil. The resulting models could be used to simulate exposure at any clinically relevant dose and bridge therapeutic dose range between the two drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23743781     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-013-1545-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  26 in total

1.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study to assess the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of gabapentin enacarbil in subjects with restless legs syndrome.

Authors:  Ritu Lal; Aaron Ellenbogen; Dan Chen; Katie Zomorodi; Harisha Atluri; Wendy Luo; James Tovera; Janet Hurt; Daniel Bonzo; Marie-Liesse Lassauzet; Amanda Vu; Kenneth C Cundy
Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.592

2.  Clinical pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies of gabapentin enacarbil, a novel transported prodrug of gabapentin, with naproxen and cimetidine.

Authors:  Ritu Lal; Juthamas Sukbuntherng; Wendy Luo; Virna Vicente; Robin Blumenthal; Judy Ho; Kenneth C Cundy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in infants and children.

Authors:  D Ouellet; H N Bockbrader; D L Wesche; D Y Shapiro; E Garofalo
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.045

4.  Efficacy of gabapentin enacarbil vs placebo in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and a pharmacokinetic comparison with oral gabapentin.

Authors:  Miroslav M Backonja; Daniel M Canafax; Kenneth C Cundy
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between phenobarbitone and gabapentin.

Authors:  W D Hooper; M C Kavanagh; G K Herkes; M J Eadie
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Gabapentin enhances the analgesic effect of morphine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  K Eckhardt; S Ammon; U Hofmann; A Riebe; N Gugeler; G Mikus
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Inter- and intra-subject variability in gabapentin absorption and absolute bioavailability.

Authors:  B E Gidal; L L Radulovic; S Kruger; P Rutecki; M Pitterle; H N Bockbrader
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.045

8.  Gabapentin bioavailability: effect of dose and frequency of administration in adult patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  B E Gidal; J DeCerce; H N Bockbrader; J Gonzalez; S Kruger; M E Pitterle; P Rutecki; R E Ramsay
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.045

9.  A saturable transport mechanism in the intestinal absorption of gabapentin is the underlying cause of the lack of proportionality between increasing dose and drug levels in plasma.

Authors:  B H Stewart; A R Kugler; P R Thompson; H N Bockbrader
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in subjects with various degrees of renal function.

Authors:  R A Blum; T J Comstock; D A Sica; R W Schultz; E Keller; P Reetze; H Bockbrader; D Tuerck; J A Busch; P A Reece
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Application of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Product Life Cycle Management. A Case Study with a Carbidopa-Levodopa Extended-Release Formulation.

Authors:  Nishit B Modi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Gabapentin enacarbil for the treatment of moderate to severe primary restless legs syndrome (Willis-Ekbom disease): 600 or 1,200 mg dose?

Authors:  Akito Kume
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 3.  Dose-related beneficial and harmful effects of gabapentin in postoperative pain management - post hoc analyses from a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.

Authors:  Maria Louise Fabritius; Jørn Wetterslev; Ole Mathiesen; Jørgen B Dahl
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.133

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.