Literature DB >> 22325684

Effectiveness of audio feedback for partial weight-bearing in and outside the hospital: a randomized controlled trial.

Henri L Hurkmans1, Johannes B Bussmann, Eric Benda, Jan A Verhaar, Henk J Stam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of partial weight-bearing (PWB) training with audio feedback in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Orthopedic clinic and patients' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=38) after THA with trochanteric osteotomy. INTERVENTION: Patients were trained with (n=18) or without (n=20) audio feedback to perform PWB at a 10% body weight (BW) target load. PWB training started on day 2 or 3 postoperatively and was given once per day during the entire hospital stay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean peak load (%BW), and the percentage of steps below, equal to, and above the target load. Weight-bearing was measured using an insole pressure system on postoperative day 7 in the hospital during PWB training (condition 1 [C1]) and when patients walked unsupervised (condition 2 [C2]), and on postoperative day 21 at home (condition 3 [C3]).
RESULTS: PWB training with audio feedback resulted in better PWB (11.1% BW vs control, 21.9% BW; P=.006) at C1. The audio feedback group had more steps below the target load (21.4% vs control, 7.8%; P=.020) and fewer steps above the target load (15.6% vs control, 45.0%; P=.015). For C2 and C3, no significant differences were found between the patients receiving PWB training with and without audio feedback, for all outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with THA who received audio feedback were able to accurately perform PWB at the prescribed target load during PWB training, but were unable to replicate the prescribed target load when they walked unsupervised in the hospital or at home.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22325684     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current Concepts and Controversies in Rehabilitation After Surgery for Multiple Ligament Knee Injury.

Authors:  Andrew D Lynch; Terese Chmielewski; Lane Bailey; Michael Stuart; Jonathan Cooper; Cathy Coady; Terrance Sgroi; Johnny Owens; Robert Schenck; Daniel Whelan; Volker Musahl; James Irrgang
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  How New Technology Is Improving Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Johnny G Owens; Michelle R Rauzi; Andrew Kittelson; Jeremy Graber; Michael J Bade; Julia Johnson; Dustin Nabhan
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

3.  Weight-bearing recommendations after operative fracture treatment-fact or fiction? Gait results with and feasibility of a dynamic, continuous pedobarography insole.

Authors:  Benedikt J Braun; Nils T Veith; Mika Rollmann; Marcel Orth; Tobias Fritz; Steven C Herath; Jörg H Holstein; Tim Pohlemann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Developing and Selecting Auditory Warnings for a Real-Time Behavioral Intervention.

Authors:  John Bellettiere; Suzanne C Hughes; Sandy Liles; Marie Boman-Davis; Neil Klepeis; Elaine Blumberg; Jeff Mills; Vincent Berardi; Saori Obayashi; T Tracy Allen; Melbourne F Hovell
Journal:  Am J Public Health Res       Date:  2014

5.  [A new continuous gait analysis system for ankle fracture aftercare].

Authors:  B J Braun; N T Veith; S C Herath; R Hell; M Rollmann; M Orth; J H Holstein; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Sensory substitution for orthopaedic gait rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice guideline development.

Authors:  Peter Lynch; Patrick Broderick; Kenneth Monaghan
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-10-08

7.  Validation and reliability testing of a new, fully integrated gait analysis insole.

Authors:  Benedikt Johannes Braun; Nils Thomas Veith; Rebecca Hell; Stefan Döbele; Michael Roland; Mika Rollmann; Jörg Holstein; Tim Pohlemann
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Biofeedback in Partial Weight Bearing: Usability of Two Different Devices from a Patient's and Physical Therapist's Perspective.

Authors:  Remko van Lieshout; Martijn F Pisters; Benedicte Vanwanseele; Rob A de Bie; Eveline J Wouters; Mirelle J Stukstette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Virtual sensory feedback for gait improvement in neurological patients.

Authors:  Yoram Baram
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Permissive weight bearing in trauma patients with fracture of the lower extremities: prospective multicenter comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Pishtiwan H S Kalmet; Guido Meys; Yvette Y V Horn; Silvia M A A Evers; Henk A M Seelen; Paul Hustinx; Heinrich Janzing; Alexander Vd Veen; Coen Jaspars; Jan Bernard Sintenie; Taco J Blokhuis; Martijn Poeze; Peter R G Brink
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.