OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of partial weight-bearing (PWB) training with audio feedback in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:Orthopedic clinic and patients' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=38) after THA with trochanteric osteotomy. INTERVENTION: Patients were trained with (n=18) or without (n=20) audio feedback to perform PWB at a 10% body weight (BW) target load. PWB training started on day 2 or 3 postoperatively and was given once per day during the entire hospital stay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean peak load (%BW), and the percentage of steps below, equal to, and above the target load. Weight-bearing was measured using an insole pressure system on postoperative day 7 in the hospital during PWB training (condition 1 [C1]) and when patients walked unsupervised (condition 2 [C2]), and on postoperative day 21 at home (condition 3 [C3]). RESULTS:PWB training with audio feedback resulted in better PWB (11.1% BW vs control, 21.9% BW; P=.006) at C1. The audio feedback group had more steps below the target load (21.4% vs control, 7.8%; P=.020) and fewer steps above the target load (15.6% vs control, 45.0%; P=.015). For C2 and C3, no significant differences were found between the patients receiving PWB training with and without audio feedback, for all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with THA who receivedaudio feedback were able to accurately perform PWB at the prescribed target load during PWB training, but were unable to replicate the prescribed target load when they walked unsupervised in the hospital or at home.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of partial weight-bearing (PWB) training with audio feedback in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Orthopedic clinic and patients' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=38) after THA with trochanteric osteotomy. INTERVENTION: Patients were trained with (n=18) or without (n=20) audio feedback to perform PWB at a 10% body weight (BW) target load. PWB training started on day 2 or 3 postoperatively and was given once per day during the entire hospital stay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean peak load (%BW), and the percentage of steps below, equal to, and above the target load. Weight-bearing was measured using an insole pressure system on postoperative day 7 in the hospital during PWB training (condition 1 [C1]) and when patients walked unsupervised (condition 2 [C2]), and on postoperative day 21 at home (condition 3 [C3]). RESULTS: PWB training with audio feedback resulted in better PWB (11.1% BW vs control, 21.9% BW; P=.006) at C1. The audio feedback group had more steps below the target load (21.4% vs control, 7.8%; P=.020) and fewer steps above the target load (15.6% vs control, 45.0%; P=.015). For C2 and C3, no significant differences were found between the patients receiving PWB training with and without audio feedback, for all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with THA who received audio feedback were able to accurately perform PWB at the prescribed target load during PWB training, but were unable to replicate the prescribed target load when they walked unsupervised in the hospital or at home.
Authors: Andrew D Lynch; Terese Chmielewski; Lane Bailey; Michael Stuart; Jonathan Cooper; Cathy Coady; Terrance Sgroi; Johnny Owens; Robert Schenck; Daniel Whelan; Volker Musahl; James Irrgang Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2017-09
Authors: Johnny G Owens; Michelle R Rauzi; Andrew Kittelson; Jeremy Graber; Michael J Bade; Julia Johnson; Dustin Nabhan Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2020-04
Authors: Benedikt J Braun; Nils T Veith; Mika Rollmann; Marcel Orth; Tobias Fritz; Steven C Herath; Jörg H Holstein; Tim Pohlemann Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: John Bellettiere; Suzanne C Hughes; Sandy Liles; Marie Boman-Davis; Neil Klepeis; Elaine Blumberg; Jeff Mills; Vincent Berardi; Saori Obayashi; T Tracy Allen; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Am J Public Health Res Date: 2014
Authors: B J Braun; N T Veith; S C Herath; R Hell; M Rollmann; M Orth; J H Holstein; T Pohlemann Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Benedikt Johannes Braun; Nils Thomas Veith; Rebecca Hell; Stefan Döbele; Michael Roland; Mika Rollmann; Jörg Holstein; Tim Pohlemann Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Remko van Lieshout; Martijn F Pisters; Benedicte Vanwanseele; Rob A de Bie; Eveline J Wouters; Mirelle J Stukstette Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pishtiwan H S Kalmet; Guido Meys; Yvette Y V Horn; Silvia M A A Evers; Henk A M Seelen; Paul Hustinx; Heinrich Janzing; Alexander Vd Veen; Coen Jaspars; Jan Bernard Sintenie; Taco J Blokhuis; Martijn Poeze; Peter R G Brink Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 2.102