Literature DB >> 22324968

Directly measured mucosal pressures produced by the i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in paralysed anaesthetised patients.

S Eschertzhuber1, J Brimacombe, M Kaufmann, C Keller, W Tiefenthaler.   

Abstract

The i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ are extraglottic airway devices with non-inflatable and inflatable cuffs, respectively. We hypothesised that directly measured mucosal pressures would differ between these devices in anesthetised paralysed patients. Thirty patients were randomly allocated to receive one of these two devices. Four pressure sensors were attached to all airway devices used to measure mucosal pressure at the base of the tongue, the distal oropharynx, the hypopharynx and the pyriform fossa. At these four places, median (IQR [range]) i-gel mucosal pressures were 8.0 (2.7-10.7 [0-26.7]), 5.0 (2.7-7 [1.0-37.3]), 9.3 (2.7-13.3 [0-22.7] and 8.0 (2.7-10.7 [0-25.3]) cmH(2)O, respectively, and for the LMA Supreme, these were 5.0 (0.5-8.0 [0-33]), 4.0 (1.3-9.3 [0-24]), 10.7 (4-17.3 [0-26.7]) and 8.0 (0-10.7 [0-36]) cmH(2)O, respectively. Mucosal pressures were low and similar for both devices. The LMA Supreme mucosal pressures were higher in the hypopharynx than in the distal oropharynx (p = 0.04) and base of the tongue (p = 0.011). There were no pressure differences between the locations for the i-gel. Anaesthesia
© 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22324968     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07024.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  9 in total

1.  Superior sealing effect of a three-dimensional printed modified supraglottic airway compared with the i-gel in a three-dimensional printed airway model.

Authors:  Tomohiko Kimijima; Mitsutaka Edanaga; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients.

Authors:  Sebastian G Russo; Stephan Cremer; Tamara Galli; Christoph Eich; Anselm Bräuer; Thomas A Crozier; Martin Bauer; Micha Strack
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 3.  Complications Associated with the Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices in Perioperative Medicine.

Authors:  Pavel Michalek; William Donaldson; Eliska Vobrubova; Marek Hakl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  I-Gel is a suitable alternative to endotracheal tubes in the laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum and trendelenburg position.

Authors:  Chih-Jun Lai; Chih-Min Liu; Chun-Yu Wu; Feng-Fang Tsai; Ping-Huei Tseng; Shou-Zen Fan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Evaluation of the optimal cuff volume and cuff pressure of the revised laryngeal tube "LTS-D" in surgical patients.

Authors:  Marc Kriege; Christian Alflen; Johannes Eisel; Thomas Ott; Tim Piepho; Ruediger R Noppens
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Srinath Damodaran; Sameer Sethi; Surender Kumar Malhotra; Tanvir Samra; Souvik Maitra; Vikas Saini
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

7.  A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.

Authors:  Jee-Eun Chang; Hyerim Kim; Jung-Man Lee; Seong-Won Min; Dongwook Won; Kwanghoon Jun; Jin-Young Hwang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Comparison of Ambu AuraGain at low cuff pressure, Ambu AuraGain at high cuff pressure and i-gel in relation to incidence of postoperative upper airway complications.

Authors:  G P Deepak; Rakesh Kumar; Munisha Agarwal; Manoj Bharadwaj; Neera G Kumar; Riniki Sarma
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-22

9.  Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sang Yoong Park; Jong Cheol Rim; Hyuk Kim; Ji Hyeon Lee; Chan Jong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-09-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.