BACKGROUND/AIMS: The economic impact of dyspepsia in regions with a diverse healthcare system remains uncertain. This study aimed to estimate the costs of dyspepsia in a rural and urban population in Malaysia. METHODS: Economic evaluation was performed based on the cost-of-illness method. Resource utilization and quality of life data over a specific time frame, were collected to determine direct, indirect and intangible costs related to dyspepsia. RESULTS: The prevalences of dyspepsia in the rural (n = 2,000) and urban (n = 2,039) populations were 14.6% and 24.3% respectively. Differences in socioeconomic status and healthcare utilisation between both populations were considerable. The cost of dyspepsia per 1,000 population per year was estimated at USD14,816.10 and USD59,282.20 in the rural and urban populations respectively. The cost per quality adjusted life year for dyspepsia in rural and urban adults was USD16.30 and USD69.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The economic impact of dyspepsia is greater in an urban compared to a rural setting. Differences in socioeconomic status and healthcare utilisation between populations are thought to contribute to this difference.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The economic impact of dyspepsia in regions with a diverse healthcare system remains uncertain. This study aimed to estimate the costs of dyspepsia in a rural and urban population in Malaysia. METHODS: Economic evaluation was performed based on the cost-of-illness method. Resource utilization and quality of life data over a specific time frame, were collected to determine direct, indirect and intangible costs related to dyspepsia. RESULTS: The prevalences of dyspepsia in the rural (n = 2,000) and urban (n = 2,039) populations were 14.6% and 24.3% respectively. Differences in socioeconomic status and healthcare utilisation between both populations were considerable. The cost of dyspepsia per 1,000 population per year was estimated at USD14,816.10 and USD59,282.20 in the rural and urban populations respectively. The cost per quality adjusted life year for dyspepsia in rural and urban adults was USD16.30 and USD69.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The economic impact of dyspepsia is greater in an urban compared to a rural setting. Differences in socioeconomic status and healthcare utilisation between populations are thought to contribute to this difference.
Entities:
Keywords:
Asia; Dyspepsia; Health; Population; Quality-adjusted life years
Authors: Richard A Brook; Nathan L Kleinman; Rok Seon Choung; Arthur K Melkonian; James E Smeeding; Nicholas J Talley Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Wai Zhu Sun; Yan Li Ju; Sheung Sheung Hung; Wai Ling Lin; Ka Chun Leung; Vincent C H Chung; Charlene H L Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Samuel Y S Wong; Justin C Y Wu Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh; Chamhuri Siwar; Mohd Azlan Shah Zaidi; Hazila Abdul Kadir Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 3.295