| Literature DB >> 22323976 |
Ha Bum Jung1, Kyung Hwa Choi, Seung Choul Yang, Woong Kyu Han.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) has been reported to be as safe and effective as open surgery. We systematically evaluated the safety of video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery-living donor nephrectomy (VAMS-LDN) with use of the modified Clavien classification.Entities:
Keywords: Intraoperative complications; Living donors; Nephrectomy; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive
Year: 2012 PMID: 22323976 PMCID: PMC3272558 DOI: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.1.54
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Urol ISSN: 2005-6737
Preoperative characteristics and perioperative outcomes
BMI, body mass index.
a: Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, mild anemia in females (hemoglobin 10 to 11 g/dl), or mild dyslipidemia (total cholesterol 220 to 270 mg/dl or triglyceride 150 to 200 mg/dl. b: Dividing within 1 cm from the aorta. c: Gonadal vein anomalies, lumbar vein anomalies, aberrant vessel, double inferior vena cava, inferior vena cava interposition.
Surgical complications
Rt, right; Lt, left; RA, renal artery; LV, lumbar vein; RV, renal vein; AV, adrenal vein; MCT, medium-chain triglyceride; TPN, total parenteral nutrition; EBL, estimated blood loss; OP, operation.
a: All vascular injuries were immediately repaired with polypropylene suture. b: p-value for the right VAMS-LDN (Video-assisted Minilaparotomy Surgery-Living Donor nephrectomy).
FIG. 1Comparison of the complications according to the surgical techniques (LDN vs. VAMS). LDN: laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, VAMS: Video-assited Minilaparotomy Surgery.