UNLABELLED: We investigated the impact of (18)F-DOPA brain PET/CT on the clinical management of patients with known or suspected brain tumors. METHODS: A prospective survey of referring physicians was conducted. A pre-PET questionnaire inquired about indication, tumor histology or grade, level of suspicion for tumor recurrence, and planned management. Early post-PET questionnaires asked referring physicians to categorize PET findings as negative, equivocal, or positive; assessed the level of suspicion for primary or recurrent brain tumor; and recorded intended management changes prompted by PET findings. A late follow-up questionnaire 6 mo after the scan aimed at determining patient outcome (recurrence, survival). In addition, all referring physicians were contacted to determine whether management changes intended after (18)F-DOPA PET/CT were implemented. RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients were included. The clinical suspicion for recurrence increased in 33%, remained unchanged in 50%, and decreased in 17% of patients after adding the PET/CT result to the available diagnostic data. The late post-PET questionnaire confirmed recurrence in 26 patients whereas 32 had stable disease or remained disease-free. (18)F-DOPA PET/CT resulted in intended management changes in 41% of patients. Changes in intended management from wait and watch to chemotherapy (6 patients [25%]) and from chemotherapy to wait and watch (4 patients [17%]) occurred most frequently. Clinical follow-up revealed that 75% of intended treatment changes were implemented. CONCLUSION: (18)F-DOPA PET/CT changed the intended management of 41% of patients with brain tumors, and intended management changes were implemented in 75% of these. These changes suggest a potentially important clinical role of imaging amino acid transport in the management of brain tumor patients.
UNLABELLED: We investigated the impact of (18)F-DOPA brain PET/CT on the clinical management of patients with known or suspected brain tumors. METHODS: A prospective survey of referring physicians was conducted. A pre-PET questionnaire inquired about indication, tumor histology or grade, level of suspicion for tumor recurrence, and planned management. Early post-PET questionnaires asked referring physicians to categorize PET findings as negative, equivocal, or positive; assessed the level of suspicion for primary or recurrent brain tumor; and recorded intended management changes prompted by PET findings. A late follow-up questionnaire 6 mo after the scan aimed at determining patient outcome (recurrence, survival). In addition, all referring physicians were contacted to determine whether management changes intended after (18)F-DOPA PET/CT were implemented. RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients were included. The clinical suspicion for recurrence increased in 33%, remained unchanged in 50%, and decreased in 17% of patients after adding the PET/CT result to the available diagnostic data. The late post-PET questionnaire confirmed recurrence in 26 patients whereas 32 had stable disease or remained disease-free. (18)F-DOPA PET/CT resulted in intended management changes in 41% of patients. Changes in intended management from wait and watch to chemotherapy (6 patients [25%]) and from chemotherapy to wait and watch (4 patients [17%]) occurred most frequently. Clinical follow-up revealed that 75% of intended treatment changes were implemented. CONCLUSION: (18)F-DOPA PET/CT changed the intended management of 41% of patients with brain tumors, and intended management changes were implemented in 75% of these. These changes suggest a potentially important clinical role of imaging amino acid transport in the management of brain tumorpatients.
Authors: Johannes Schwarzenberg; Johannes Czernin; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson; Whitney B Pope; Tristan Grogan; David Elashoff; Cheri Geist; Daniel H S Silverman; Michael E Phelps; Wei Chen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ken Herrmann; Johannes Czernin; Timothy Cloughesy; Albert Lai; Kelsey L Pomykala; Matthias R Benz; Andreas K Buck; Michael E Phelps; Wei Chen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Nathalie L Albert; Michael Weller; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Christian la Fougère; Whitney Pope; Ian Law; Javier Arbizu; Marc C Chamberlain; Michael Vogelbaum; Ben M Ellingson; Joerg C Tonn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Manuel Gómez-Río; Nathalie Testart Dardel; Alicia Santiago Chinchilla; Antonio Rodríguez-Fernández; Gonzalo Olivares Granados; Raquel Luque Caro; Mercedes Zurita Herrera; Clara E Chamorro Santos; Pablo Lardelli-Claret; José M Llamas-Elvira Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christopher L Tinkle; Elizabeth C Duncan; Mikhail Doubrovin; Yuanyuan Han; Yimei Li; Hyun Kim; Alberto Broniscer; Scott E Snyder; Thomas E Merchant; Barry L Shulkin Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ryan S Youland; Gaspar J Kitange; Timothy E Peterson; Deanna H Pafundi; Judi A Ramiscal; Jenny L Pokorny; Caterina Giannini; Nadia N Laack; Ian F Parney; Val J Lowe; Debra H Brinkmann; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-10-20 Impact factor: 4.130