Christopher L Tinkle1, Elizabeth C Duncan2, Mikhail Doubrovin3, Yuanyuan Han4, Yimei Li4, Hyun Kim5, Alberto Broniscer6, Scott E Snyder3, Thomas E Merchant7, Barry L Shulkin3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee christopher.tinkle@stjude.org. 2. University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 4. Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri; and. 6. Department of Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Abstract
The role of metabolic imaging in the diagnosis, treatment, and response assessment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is poorly defined. We investigated the uptake of 11C-methionine in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed DIPG and evaluated the associations of 11C-methionine PET metrics with conventional MRI indices and survival outcomes. Methods: Twenty-two patients with newly diagnosed DIPG were prospectively enrolled on an institutional review board-approved investigational study of 11C-methionine PET. All patients underwent baseline 11C-methionine PET/CT, and initial treatment-response scans after chemotherapy or radiation therapy were obtained for 17 patients. Typical and atypical DIPGs were assessed clinically and radiographically and defined by multidisciplinary consensus. Three-dimensional regions of interest, reviewed by consensus between a nuclear medicine physician and a radiation oncologist, were delineated after coregistration of PET and MR images. Associations of 11C-methionine uptake intensity and uniformity with survival, along with associations between 11C-methionine uptake and conventional MRI tumor indices over time, were evaluated. 11C-methionine PET voxel values within regions of interest were assessed as threshold values across proportions of the study population, and 11C-methionine uptake at baseline was assessed relative to MRI-defined tumor progression. Results: 11C-methionine uptake above that of uninvolved brain tissue was observed in 18 of 22 baseline scans (82%) and 15 of 17 initial response scans (88%). 11C-methionine avidity within MRI-defined tumor was limited in extent, with 11 of 18 positive baseline 11C-methionine PET scans (61%) showing less than 25% 11C-methionine-avid tumor. The increase in total tumor volume with 11C-methionine PET was relatively limited (17.2%; interquartile range, 6.53%-38.90%), as was the extent of 11C-methionine uptake beyond the MRI-defined tumor (2.2%; interquartile range, 0.55%-10.88%). Although baseline 11C-methionine PET intensity and uniformity metrics did not correlate with survival outcomes, initial 11C-methionine avidity overlapped with recurrent tumor in 100% of cases. A clinical diagnosis of atypical DIPG was associated with borderline significantly prolonged progression-free survival (P = 0.07), yet 11C-methionine PET indices at diagnosis did not differ significantly between atypical and typical DIPGs. Conclusion: Most newly diagnosed DIPGs are successfully visualized by 11C-methionine PET. Baseline 11C-methionine uptake delineates regions at increased risk for recurrence, yet intensity and uniformity metrics did not correlate with treatment outcomes in children with DIPG in this study.
The role of metabolic imaging in the diagnosis, treatment, and response assessment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is poorly defined. We investigated the uptake of 11C-methionine in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed DIPG and evaluated the associations of 11C-methionine PET metrics with conventional MRI indices and survival outcomes. Methods: Twenty-two patients with newly diagnosed DIPG were prospectively enrolled on an institutional review board-approved investigational study of 11C-methionine PET. All patients underwent baseline 11C-methionine PET/CT, and initial treatment-response scans after chemotherapy or radiation therapy were obtained for 17 patients. Typical and atypical DIPGs were assessed clinically and radiographically and defined by multidisciplinary consensus. Three-dimensional regions of interest, reviewed by consensus between a nuclear medicine physician and a radiation oncologist, were delineated after coregistration of PET and MR images. Associations of 11C-methionine uptake intensity and uniformity with survival, along with associations between 11C-methionine uptake and conventional MRI tumor indices over time, were evaluated. 11C-methionine PET voxel values within regions of interest were assessed as threshold values across proportions of the study population, and 11C-methionine uptake at baseline was assessed relative to MRI-defined tumor progression. Results:11C-methionine uptake above that of uninvolved brain tissue was observed in 18 of 22 baseline scans (82%) and 15 of 17 initial response scans (88%). 11C-methionine avidity within MRI-defined tumor was limited in extent, with 11 of 18 positive baseline 11C-methionine PET scans (61%) showing less than 25% 11C-methionine-avid tumor. The increase in total tumor volume with 11C-methionine PET was relatively limited (17.2%; interquartile range, 6.53%-38.90%), as was the extent of 11C-methionine uptake beyond the MRI-defined tumor (2.2%; interquartile range, 0.55%-10.88%). Although baseline 11C-methionine PET intensity and uniformity metrics did not correlate with survival outcomes, initial 11C-methionine avidity overlapped with recurrent tumor in 100% of cases. A clinical diagnosis of atypical DIPG was associated with borderline significantly prolonged progression-free survival (P = 0.07), yet 11C-methionine PET indices at diagnosis did not differ significantly between atypical and typical DIPGs. Conclusion: Most newly diagnosed DIPGs are successfully visualized by 11C-methionine PET. Baseline 11C-methionine uptake delineates regions at increased risk for recurrence, yet intensity and uniformity metrics did not correlate with treatment outcomes in children with DIPG in this study.
Authors: Anca-Ligia Grosu; Wolfgang A Weber; Eva Riedel; Branislav Jeremic; Carsten Nieder; Martina Franz; Hartmut Gumprecht; Ruprecht Jaeger; Markus Schwaiger; Michael Molls Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Katherine A Zukotynski; Frederic H Fahey; Mehmet Kocak; Abass Alavi; Terence Z Wong; S Ted Treves; Barry L Shulkin; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Jeffrey R Geyer; Sridhar Vajapeyam; James M Boyett; Larry E Kun; Tina Young Poussaint Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Amy Rosenfeld; Michael Etzl; Dan Bandy; David Carpenteri; Annie Gieseking; Igor Dvorchik; Allen Kaplan Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Stephanie Puget; Kevin Beccaria; Thomas Blauwblomme; Thomas Roujeau; Syril James; Jacques Grill; Michel Zerah; Pascale Varlet; Christian Sainte-Rose Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Irwin H Lee; Morand Piert; Diana Gomez-Hassan; Larry Junck; Lisa Rogers; James Hayman; Randall K Ten Haken; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao; Christina Tsien Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lisbeth Marner; Michael Lundemann; Astrid Sehested; Karsten Nysom; Lise Borgwardt; René Mathiasen; Peder S Wehner; Otto M Henriksen; Carsten Thomsen; Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen; Helle Broholm; Olga Østrup; Julie L Forman; Liselotte Højgaard; Ian Law Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Mariam Aboian; Ramon Barajas; Julia Shatalov; Vahid Ravanfar; Emma Bahroos; Elizabeth Tong; Jennie W Taylor; N Oberheim Bush; Patricia Sneed; Youngho Seo; Soonmee Cha; Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2020-10-14
Authors: Arnoldo Piccardo; Nathalie L Albert; Lise Borgwardt; Frederic H Fahey; Darren Hargrave; Norbert Galldiks; Nina Jehanno; Lars Kurch; Ian Law; Ruth Lim; Egesta Lopci; Lisbeth Marner; Giovanni Morana; Tina Young Poussaint; Victor J Seghers; Barry L Shulkin; Katherine E Warren; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Pietro Zucchetta Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 10.057