Literature DB >> 22323357

Estimation of lean body weight in older women with hip fracture.

S J Mitchell1, S N Hilmer, C M J Kirkpatrick, R D Hansen, D A Williamson, N A Singh, T P Finnegan, B J Allen, T H Diamond, A D Diwan, B D Lloyd, E U R Smith, M A Fiatarone Singh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lean body weight (LBW) decreases with age while total body fat increases, resulting in altered drug pharmacokinetics. A semi-mechanistic equation estimating LBW using height, weight and sex has been developed for potential use across a wide range of body compositions. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of the LBW equation to estimate dual energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived fat free mass (FFM(DXA)) in a population of older women with recent hip fracture.
METHODS: Baseline, four and 12 month data obtained from 23 women enrolled in the Sarcopenia and Hip Fracture study were pooled to give 58 measurements. LBW was estimated using the equation: LBW (kg) = (9270 x Wt) / (8780 + (244 x BMI)). Body composition was classified as: 'normal' (BMI <25kg/m(2) and not sarcopenic), 'overweight-obese' (BMI >25kg/m(2) and not sarcopenic), 'sarcopenic' (sarcopenic and BMI <25kg/m(2)), or 'sarcopenic-obese' (sarcopenic and BMI >25kg/m(2)). The ability of the LBW equation to predict FFMDXA was determined graphically using Bland-Altman plots and quantitatively using the method of Sheiner and Beal.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD age of female participants women was 83±7 years (n=23). Sarcopenia was frequently observed (65.2%). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated an underestimation by the LBW equation compared to FFMDXA. The bias (95% CI) and precision (95% CI) calculated using the method of Sheiner and Beal was 0.5kg (-0.7, 1.66kg) and 4.4kg (-3.7, 12.4kg) respectively for pooled data.
CONCLUSION: This equation can be used to easily calculate LBW. When compared to FFMDXA, the LBW equation resulted in a small underestimation on average in this population of women with recent hip fracture. The degree of bias may not be clinically important although further studies of larger heterogeneous cohorts are needed to investigate and potentially improve the accuracy of this predictive equation in larger clinical cohorts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22323357     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-011-0100-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  30 in total

Review 1.  Aging biology and geriatric clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  Allan J McLean; David G Le Couteur
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas.

Authors:  P Deurenberg; J A Weststrate; J C Seidell
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 3.  The meaning and measurement of lean body mass.

Authors:  R Roubenoff; J J Kehayias
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.

Authors:  L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Sarcopenic obesity predicts instrumental activities of daily living disability in the elderly.

Authors:  Richard N Baumgartner; Sharon J Wayne; Debra L Waters; Ian Janssen; Dympna Gallagher; John E Morley
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2004-12

7.  Effects of metal implants on whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral content and body composition.

Authors:  Lora M Giangregorio; Colin E Webber
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.248

8.  Uptake of acetaminophen (paracetamol) by isolated rat liver cells.

Authors:  M E McPhail; R G Knowles; M Salter; J Dawson; B Burchell; C I Pogson
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1993-04-22       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 9.  Body mass index as a measure of body fatness in the elderly.

Authors:  P Deurenberg; K van der Kooy; T Hulshof; P Evers
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Estimation of thigh muscle cross-sectional area by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in frail elderly patients.

Authors:  Ross D Hansen; Dominique A Williamson; Terence P Finnegan; Brad D Lloyd; Jodie N Grady; Terrence H Diamond; Emma Ur Smith; Theodora M Stavrinos; Martin W Thompson; Tom H Gwinn; Barry J Allen; Peter I Smerdely; Ashish D Diwan; Nalin A Singh; Maria A Fiatarone Singh
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in old age and frailty.

Authors:  Sarah N Hilmer; Kim Tran; Patrick Rubie; Jason Wright; Danijela Gnjidic; Sarah J Mitchell; Slade Matthews; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  DESIGNING DRUG TRIALS FOR SARCOPENIA IN OLDER ADULTS WITH HIP FRACTURE - A TASK FORCE FROM THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ONFRAILTY AND SARCOPENIA RESEARCH (ICFSR).

Authors:  B Vellas; R Fielding; R Miller; Y Rolland; S Bhasin; J Magaziner; H Bischoff-Ferrari
Journal:  J Frailty Aging       Date:  2014

3.  The impact of frailty on pharmacokinetics in older people: using gentamicin population pharmacokinetic modeling to investigate changes in renal drug clearance by glomerular filtration.

Authors:  Claire Johnston; Sarah N Hilmer; Andrew J McLachlan; Slade T Matthews; Peter R Carroll; Carl M Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.953

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.