Literature DB >> 11716015

Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes in spine surgery: consideration of mineralized and demineralized preparations and growth factor supplementation.

S Berven1, B K Tay, F S Kleinstueck, D S Bradford.   

Abstract

Bone graft substitutes may be broadly classified as mineralized and demineralized preparations. This article reviews the basic science and biology underlying each preparation. A review of the clinical and experimental applications of each preparation follows. The text concludes with a review of growth factors as biological supplements.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11716015      PMCID： PMC3611549          DOI： 10.1007/s005860100270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN： 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Bridging posttraumatic bony defects. Established and new methods].

Authors:  M Schieker; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Demineralized bone matrix, as a graft enhancer of auto-local bone in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Dong Ki Ahn; Sang Ho Moon; Tae Woo Kim; Kyung Hwan Boo; Sung Won Hong
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-04-08

Review 3.  Use of demineralized bone matrix in the extremities.

Authors:  Georgios I Drosos; Panagiotis Touzopoulos; Athanasios Ververidis; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Konstantinos Kazakos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 4.  Decellularized tissue and cell-derived extracellular matrices as scaffolds for orthopaedic tissue engineering.

Authors:  Christina W Cheng; Loran D Solorio; Eben Alsberg
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 14.227

5.  Assessment of successful incorporation of cages after cervical or lumbar intercorporal fusion with [(18)F]fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Dorothee R Fischer; K Zweifel; V Treyer; R Hesselmann; A Johayem; K D M Stumpe; G K von Schulthess; T F Hany; K Strobel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity of NanoFUSE(®) DBM.

Authors:  James F Kirk; Gregg Ritter; Chad Waters; Sonoko Narisawa; José Luis Millán; James D Talton
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 1.522

7.  Ceramic bone graft substitute vs autograft in XLIF: a prospective randomized single-center evaluation of radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Cristiano Magalhães Menezes; Gabriel Carvalho Lacerda; Germano Senna Oliveira do Valle; André de Oliveira Arruda; Erica Godinho Menezes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.721

8.  Effect of Hydroxyapatite porous characteristics on healing outcomes in rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion model.

Authors:  Makoto Motomiya; Manabu Ito; Masahiko Takahata; Ken Kadoya; Kazuharu Irie; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Anthony M T Chau; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  No Detectable Alteration of Inorganic Allogeneic Bone Matrix Colonizing Mesenchymal Cells: A Step Towards Personalized Bone Grafts.

Authors:  Roger Erivan; Nicolas Samper; Guillaume Villatte; Stéphane Boisgard; Stéphane Descamps; Marc Berger
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.