S M Sung1, T H Lee, H J Cho, Y L Sol, K H Park, D S Jung, C W Kim. 1. Stroke Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University, School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recanalization with the Wingspan stent, which can be deployed rapidly and safely, is an option for treating acute ischemic stroke when intravenous thrombolysis has failed or is contraindicated. This study was performed to evaluate feasibility, efficacy, and safety of recanalization for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion using the Wingspan stent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected 10 patients with acute MCA occlusion in whom recanalization was not achieved with a standard intravenous thrombolysis, or who were ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis, or who presented after 3 hours of symptom onset and in whom the stent placement could be completed within 8 hours from symptom onset. We analyzed angiographic and clinical results. RESULTS: Successful recanalization with the Wingspan stent was achieved in all patients. The mean NIHSS score on admission was 12.7 points (range 4-21). The occlusion sites were located in the 1st segment (n = 7; 2 left, 5 right) and 2nd segment (n = 3, all right) of the MCA. The mean time interval from stroke symptom onset to stent placement was 344.8 ± 76.3 minutes. No intracranial hemorrhage, vessel perforations, or dissections occurred in any patient. Nine patients improved on the NIHSS at 7 days. One patient did not have a change in the NIHSS score, even though the occluded artery was completely recanalized. At 7 days, the NIHSS score of all patients was 4.4 ± 4.7 (median 4, range 0-13). At discharge, an mRS of ≤ 3 was achieved in all patients and an mRS of ≤ 2 was achieved in 7 patients (70%). CONCLUSIONS: This small case series demonstrates the feasibility of using the Wingspan stent safely and effectively for MCA occlusions when standard treatments are ineffective or not available.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recanalization with the Wingspan stent, which can be deployed rapidly and safely, is an option for treating acute ischemic stroke when intravenous thrombolysis has failed or is contraindicated. This study was performed to evaluate feasibility, efficacy, and safety of recanalization for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion using the Wingspan stent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected 10 patients with acute MCA occlusion in whom recanalization was not achieved with a standard intravenous thrombolysis, or who were ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis, or who presented after 3 hours of symptom onset and in whom the stent placement could be completed within 8 hours from symptom onset. We analyzed angiographic and clinical results. RESULTS: Successful recanalization with the Wingspan stent was achieved in all patients. The mean NIHSS score on admission was 12.7 points (range 4-21). The occlusion sites were located in the 1st segment (n = 7; 2 left, 5 right) and 2nd segment (n = 3, all right) of the MCA. The mean time interval from stroke symptom onset to stent placement was 344.8 ± 76.3 minutes. No intracranial hemorrhage, vessel perforations, or dissections occurred in any patient. Nine patients improved on the NIHSS at 7 days. One patient did not have a change in the NIHSS score, even though the occluded artery was completely recanalized. At 7 days, the NIHSS score of all patients was 4.4 ± 4.7 (median 4, range 0-13). At discharge, an mRS of ≤ 3 was achieved in all patients and an mRS of ≤ 2 was achieved in 7 patients (70%). CONCLUSIONS: This small case series demonstrates the feasibility of using the Wingspan stent safely and effectively for MCA occlusions when standard treatments are ineffective or not available.
Authors: A Furlan; R Higashida; L Wechsler; M Gent; H Rowley; C Kase; M Pessin; A Ahuja; F Callahan; W M Clark; F Silver; F Rivera Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eric Sauvageau; Rodney M Samuelson; Elad I Levy; Alison M Jeziorski; Ricky A Mehta; L Nelson Hopkins Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Werner Hacke; Markku Kaste; Erich Bluhmki; Miroslav Brozman; Antoni Dávalos; Donata Guidetti; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Zakaria Medeghri; Thomas Machnig; Dietmar Schneider; Rüdiger von Kummer; Nils Wahlgren; Danilo Toni Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E I Levy; R Mehta; R Gupta; R A Hanel; A J Chamczuk; D Fiorella; H H Woo; F C Albuquerque; T G Jovin; M B Horowitz; L N Hopkins Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Annemarie Crumlish; Kenneth V Snyder; Erik F Hauck; David J Fiorella; L Nelson Hopkins; J Mocco Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Wade S Smith; Gene Sung; Jeffrey Saver; Ronald Budzik; Gary Duckwiler; David S Liebeskind; Helmi L Lutsep; Marilyn M Rymer; Randall T Higashida; Sidney Starkman; Y Pierre Gobin; Donald Frei; Thomas Grobelny; Frank Hellinger; Dan Huddle; Chelsea Kidwell; Walter Koroshetz; Michael Marks; Gary Nesbit; Isaac E Silverman Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Elad I Levy; Robert D Ecker; Ricardo A Hanel; Eric Sauvageau; J Christopher Wehman; Lee R Guterman; L Nelson Hopkins Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Osama O Zaidat; Thomas Wolfe; Syed I Hussain; John R Lynch; Rishi Gupta; Joanna Delap; Michel T Torbey; Brian-Fred Fitzsimmons Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: C J Maurer; T Dobrocky; F Joachimski; U Neuberger; T Demerath; A Brehm; A Cianfoni; B Gory; A Berlis; J Gralla; M A Möhlenbruch; K A Blackham; M N Psychogios; P Zickler; S Fischer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.825