Literature DB >> 22321538

Mercury risk from fluorescent lamps in China: current status and future perspective.

Yuanan Hu1, Hefa Cheng.   

Abstract

Energy-efficient lighting is one of the key measures for addressing electric power shortages and climate change mitigation, and fluorescent lamps are expected to dominate the lighting market in China over the next several years. This review presents an overview on the emissions and risk of mercury from fluorescent lamps during production and disposal, and discusses measures for reducing the mercury risk through solid waste management and source reduction. Fluorescent lamps produced in China used to contain relatively large amounts of mercury (up to 40 mg per lamp) due to the prevalence of liquid mercury dosing, which also released significant amounts of mercury to the environment. Upgrade of the mercury dosing technologies and manufacturing facilities had significantly reduced the mercury contents in fluorescent lamps, with most of them containing less than 10 or 5mg per lamp now. Occupational hygiene studies showed that mercury emissions occurred during fluorescent lamp production, particularly in the facilities using liquid mercury dosing, which polluted the environmental media at and surrounding the production sites and posed chronic health risk to the workers by causing neuropsychological and motor impairments. It is estimated that spent fluorescent lamps account for approximately 20% of mercury input in the MSW in China. Even though recycling of fluorescent lamps presents an important opportunity to capture the mercury they contain, it is difficult and not cost-effective at reducing the mercury risk under the broader context of mercury pollution control in China. In light of the significant mercury emissions associated with electricity generation in China, we propose that reduction of mercury emissions and risk associated with fluorescent lamps should be achieved primarily through lowering their mercury contents by the manufacturers while recycling programs should focus on elemental mercury-containing waste products instead of fluorescent lamps to recapture mercury from the waste stream cost-effectively.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22321538     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pollution due to hazardous glass waste.

Authors:  Deepak Pant; Pooja Singh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Assessing heavy metal pollution in the surface soils of a region that had undergone three decades of intense industrialization and urbanization.

Authors:  Yuanan Hu; Xueping Liu; Jinmei Bai; Kaimin Shih; Eddy Y Zeng; Hefa Cheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Use of mercury-based medical equipment and mercury content in effluents of tertiary care hospitals in India.

Authors:  Sharda Shah Peshin; Nabanita Halder; Chandrababu Jathikarta; Yogendra Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Developmental study of mercury effects on the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster).

Authors:  Hamideh Abnoos; Masoud Fereidoni; Naser Mahdavi-Shahri; Farhang Haddad; Razieh Jalal
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2013-03

5.  Postsynthetic of MIL-101-NH2 MOFs supported on PVDF membrane for REEs recovery from waste phosphor.

Authors:  Wei Qin; Along Yu; Xue Han; Junwei Wang; Jiayin Sun; Jianli Zhang; Yaqing Weng
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  A multiple and comprehensive approach to assess health risk in amalgam-exposed Chinese workers.

Authors:  Xiao-Ying Ruan; Si-Wei Tan; Lin Zhu; Yan-Peng Shi; Jia-Mian Yu; Mei-Bian Zhang; Tong-Shuai Wang; Hong Fu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20

7.  Mercury bio-extraction by fungus Coprinus comatus: a possible bioindicator and mycoremediator of polluted soils?

Authors:  Jerzy Falandysz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 4.223

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.