| Literature DB >> 26705753 |
Abstract
The Shaggy Ink Cap (Coprinus comatus), which is a common in wild in northern hemisphere was examined in field for potential to be used as possible bio-extractor of Hg from polluted grounds but also as possible bioindicator of urban soils (roadside, barren lands, lawns) pollution with Hg. The contents of Hg in caps and stipes of C. comatus from the grounds examined in this study correlated positively with the levels of soil contamination. Analysis of sets of data available worldwide on Hg in C. comatus and soils beneath-fruiting bodies showed on a positive correlation between degree of soil and mushroom contamination. Hence, C. comatus could be considered as a sensitive species and with bioindication and bioremediation potency for soils polluted with Hg in further studies. Young-fruiting bodies of C. comatus are edible and considered excellent if consumed soon after pick-up. Eating them when foraged from the urban places can provide to a consumer Hg at relatively high dose, while unresolved question is absorption rate of Hg compounds contained in ingested mushroom meal.Entities:
Keywords: Foraging; Fungi; Mycoremediation; Shaggy Ink Cap
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26705753 PMCID: PMC4846694 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5971-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Localization of the sampling places of C. comatus and soils in the town of Kartuzy (54°20'06" N and 18°12'05" E; 1–5) and elsewhere: Kczewo (54°23'00" N and 18°20'00" E; 6), Pępowo (54°38'66" N and 18°40'23" E; 7) and Leźno (54°21'0" N and 18°26'0" E; 8) in Pomerania land in northern part of Poland (Google maps; color figure available in online version)
Summary of details on materials Coprinus comatus
| Place ID | Name of the place | Type of material | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fungus | Soil | ||
| 1 | Kartuzy, Wzgórze Wolności/ Prokowska Str. | 3 (13)b | 3 |
| 2 | Kartuzy, Sambora Str./3 Maja Str. | 3 (13) | 3 |
| 3 | Kartuzy, Węglowa Str. | 3 (15) | 3 |
| 4 | Kartuzy, Majkowskiego Str. (center of town) | 3 (13) | 3 |
| 5 | Kartuzy, Majkowskiego Str. (northern edge) | 3 (13) | 3 |
| 6 | Kczewo village | 3 (15) | 3 |
| 7 | Pępowo village | 3 (13) | 3 |
| 8 | Leźno village | 3 (13) | 3 |
Samples and total number of fruiting bodies per place (in parentheses)
anumeration of the sampling place (see Figs 1 and 2)
bnumber of pooled
Fig. 2Relationships between Hg content in the caps and stipes of Coprinus comatus and Hg in soil substratum (for caps: y = −1.2933 + 70.1161*x; r = 0.87; p < 0.005; r 2 = 0.75; p = 0.0004; for stipes: y = −0.8774 + 41.9787*x; r = 0.87; p < 0.005; r 2 = 0.75) for locations examined
Total mercury concentrations in caps and stipes of Coprinus comatus and beneath soil (mg kg−1 dm), the values of Hg caps to stipes concentration quotient (QC/S), and bioconcentration factor (BCF) values
| Place ID | Hg in mushrooms | QC/S | Hg Soil | BCFc | BCFs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caps | Stipes | |||||
| 1 | 0.88 ± 0.26 | 0.39 ± 0.90 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 0.077 | 12 ± 3 | 7.5 ± 4.5 |
| (0.59–1.1) | (0.29–0.96) | (1.1–2.1) | (0.068–0.083) | (7.8–14) | (3.8–13) | |
| 0.98 | 0.47 | 2.0 | 13 | 6.2 | ||
| 2 | 2.1 ± 1.1 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 0.04a | 52 ± 27 | 27 ± 15 |
| (0.89–3.0) | (0.42–1.6) | (1.9–2.0) | (22–62) | (22–74) | ||
| 2.5 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 62 | 30 | ||
| 3 | 9.3 ± 0.5 | 5.5 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 0.13a | 74 ± 4 | 43 ± 5 |
| (8.4–10) | (5.0–6.3) | (1.6–1.8) | (70–78) | (39–50) | ||
| 9.2 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 73 | 30 | ||
| 4 | 2.4 ± 1.6 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 0.034a | 70 ± 46 | 38 ± 23 |
| (0.58–3.6) | (0.47–2.1) | (1.2–2.2) | (17–100) | (14–60) | ||
| 3.0 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 88 | 30 | ||
| 5 | 0.79 ± 0.46 | 0.34 ± 0.21 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 0.025a | 31 ± 18 | 14 ± 8 |
| (0.35–1.3) | (0.14–0.56) | (2.2–2.5) | (14–50) | (5.6–22) | ||
| 0.75 | 0.33 | 2.3 | 30 | 13 | ||
| 6 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 0.026a | 9.5 ± 0.8 | 4.8 ± 0.7 |
| (0.24–0.28) | (0.11–0.15) | (4.3–5.6) | (8.9–10) | (5.6–22) | ||
| 0.24 | 0.12 | 1.9 | 9.2 | 13 | ||
| 7 | 0.61 ± 0.08 | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 0.024a | 26 ± 3 | 15 ± 1 |
| (0.54–0.70) | (0.32–0.38) | (1.5–2.2) | (23–29) | (13–16) | ||
| 0.61 | 0.35 | 1.6 | 25 | 15 | ||
| 8 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 0.63 ± 0.15 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 0.043a | 31 ± 5 | 15 ± 4 |
| (1.2–1.6) | (0.49–0.79) | (2.0–2.4) | (27–36) | (11–18) | ||
| 1.3 | 0.62 | 2.1 | 30 | 14 | ||
apooled samples for soil
Summary of data on total mercury concentrations in C. comatus and beneath soil, bioconcentration factor (BCF), and cap to stipe Hg content ration quotients (QC/S)
| Information | Hg mg kg dm−1 | BCF | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mushroom | Soil | |||
| Norway, background | 1.7/0.85 (cap/stipe) | Allen and Steinnes | ||
| Finland ( | 5.6 (1.5–9.8) | Laaksovirta and Lodenius | ||
| Finland, rural ( | 2.7 (2.5–2.9) | Kuusi et al. | ||
| Finland, urban ( | 4.7 (0.68–17) | Kuusi et al. | ||
| Finland, urban ( | 3.8 (1.4–10) | Lodenius et al. | ||
| Finland, lead processing area ( | 2.1 (0.6–3.5) | Liukkonen-Lilja et al. | ||
| Finland ( | 6.7 | Kojo and Lodenius | ||
| Germany ( | 1.2 (0.4–2.2) | Seeger and Nützel | ||
| Germany, Hg mining area ( | 144 | 83 | 1.7 | Fischer et al. |
| Switzerland ( | 2.8 | Stijve and Roschnik | ||
| Switzerland ( | 3.3 (0.57–8.0) | Quinche and Dvorak | ||
| Switzerland ( | 3.1 (0.51–5.6) | Quinche | ||
| Switzerland ( | 2.5a (0.40–13) | Quinche | ||
| Slovenia ( | 2.1 | 0.22 | 9.5 | Byrne et al. |
| Croatia, eastern ( | 1.4 | Grgić et al. | ||
| Spain, Lugo | 2.6 ± 1.3 (H) | 144 | Melgar et al. | |
| 2.3 ± 1.2 (RFB) | 115 | |||
| Italy, Mt. Amiata; HgS mine ( | 23 | 210 | 0.11 | Bargagli and Baldi |
| Italy, Reggio Emilia | 0.78 (0.42–1.1)a | Cocchi et al. | ||
| China, Guangdong ( | 0.04 (0.01–0.18) | Shen and Yu | ||
H hymenophore, RFB rest of fruit body
anumber of fruit bodies, 95 % confidence interval