Literature DB >> 22321500

[Clinical evaluation on the coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery].

Ke Yao1, Wei Wang, Wei Wu, Xia-jing Tang, Zhao-chun Li, Chong-fei Jin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study and compare the outcomes of coaxial 1.8 mm microincision phacoemulsification with conventional coaxial 3 mm small-incision cataract surgery.
METHODS: A randomized prospective study was conducted on 89 patients with age-related cataract: coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery (MICS group) was performed in 45 cases (45 eyes), and coaxial 3 mm small-incision cataract surgery (SICS group) was performed in 44 cases (44 eyes). Statistical analysis was taken with the data of 40 cases (40 eyes) in the MICS group and 40 cases (40 eyes) in the SICS group. The average ultrasound power (AVE) and effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) were recorded during the operation. Visual acuity, endothelial cell density and cornea thickness were compared at intervals of 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. In addition, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was analyzed. Statistic analysis was taken by student's t test and chi square test.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference on AVE and EPT (P > 0.05) between these two groups. One day after the surgery, the MICS group showed better uncorrected visual acuity (0.16 ± 0.14) as compared to the SICS group (0.23 ± 0.12). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences on best corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell density and cornea thickness between these two groups. One week, 1 month and 3 months after the surgery, SIA was (0.62 ± 0.28) D, (0.48 ± 0.28) D, (0.47 ± 0.25) D, (0.40 ± 0.24) D in the MICS group, and (1.27 ± 0.65) D, (1.18 ± 0.59) D, (1.02 ± 0.56) D, (0.79 ± 0.48) D in the SICS group, respectively. The differences between the MIC and SICS groups were statistically significant (P < 0.01). SIA decreased significantly and became stable 1 week after surgery in MICS group, while the similar tendency appeared one month after the surgery in the SICS group.
CONCLUSIONS: Coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery could significantly reduce SIA and obtain more stable astigmatism status. This suggests that the coaxial MICS phacoemulsification surgery could get earlier visual rehabilitation postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22321500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 0412-4081


  3 in total

Review 1.  Different-sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age-related cataract.

Authors:  Chongfei Jin; Xinyi Chen; Andrew Law; Yunhee Kang; Xue Wang; Wen Xu; Ke Yao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-20

2.  Long-Term Visual Quality after Microincision Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Qing Huang; Ruili Li; Liwen Feng; Na Miao; Wei Fan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Standard Coaxial Small-Incision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xingchao Shentu; Xin Zhang; Xiajing Tang; Xiaoning Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.