Literature DB >> 22321162

Hemiarthroplasty versus angle-stable locking compression plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Paul A Verbeek1, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Klaus W Wendt, Ron L Diercks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical management of dislocated three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients remains unclear. Most used techniques are hemiarthroplasty and angle-stable locking compression plate osteosynthesis. In the current literature there is no evidence available presenting superior results between hemiarthroplasty and angle-stable locking compression plate osteosynthesis in terms of speed of recovery, pain, patient satisfaction, functional outcome, quality of life or complications. METHODS/
DESIGN: A randomized controlled multicenter trial will be conducted. Patients older than 60 years of age with a dislocated three- or four-part fracture of the proximal humerus as diagnosed by X-rays and CT-scans will be included. Exclusion criteria are a fracture older than 14 days, multiple comorbidity, multitrauma, a pathological fracture, previous surgery on the injured shoulder, severely deranged function caused by a previous disease, "head-split" proximal humerus fracture and unwillingness or inability to follow instructions. Participants will be randomized between surgical treatment with hemiarthroplasty and angle-stable locking compression plate osteosynthesis. Measurements will take place preoperatively and 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively. Primary outcome measure is speed of recovery of functional capacity of the affected upper limb using the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH). Secondary outcome measures are pain, patient satisfaction, shoulder function, quality of life, radiological evaluation and complications. Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis, using univariate and multivariate analyses. DISCUSSION: Both hemiarthroplasty and angle-stable locking compression plate osteosynthesis are used in the current treatment of dislocated three-and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. There is a lack of level-1 studies comparing these two most-used surgical treatment options. This randomized controlled multicenter trial has been designed to determine which surgical treatment option provides the fastest recovery of functional capacity of the affected upper limb, and will provide better outcomes in pain, satisfaction, shoulder function, quality of life, radiological evaluation and complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR2461).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22321162      PMCID: PMC3299658          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  35 in total

Review 1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder.

Authors:  R J Hawkins; C S Neer; R M Pianta; F X Mendoza
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the head of the humerus. Natural history and management.

Authors:  R L Cruess
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-08

6.  Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Per Olerud; Leif Ahrengart; Sari Ponzer; Jenny Saving; Jan Tidermark
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  C Michael Robinson; Richard S Page; Richard M F Hill; David L Sanders; Charles M Court-Brown; Alison E Wakefield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV).

Authors:  Martine M Veehof; Eleonore J A Sleegers; Nicolette H M J van Veldhoven; Arnold H Schuurman; Nico L U van Meeteren
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures.

Authors:  S H Rose; L J Melton; B F Morrey; D M Ilstrup; B L Riggs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  B Kristiansen; G Barfod; J Bredesen; J Erin-Madsen; B Grum; M W Horsnaes; J R Aalberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1987-02
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.

Authors:  Helen Hg Handoll; Joanne Elliott; Theis M Thillemann; Patricia Aluko; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  Translation between the Neer- and the AO/OTA-classification for proximal humeral fractures: do we need to be bilingual to interpret the scientific literature?

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Henrik Eckardt; Laurent Audigé; Bernd Rolauffs; Christian Bahrs
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-02-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.