Literature DB >> 12851345

Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

C Michael Robinson1, Richard S Page, Richard M F Hill, David L Sanders, Charles M Court-Brown, Alison E Wakefield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder is used to treat complex proximal humeral fractures, although the reported functional results following this method of treatment have varied widely. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the prosthetic survival and functional outcomes in a large series of patients treated with shoulder hemiarthroplasty for a proximal humeral fracture. By determining the factors that affected the outcome, we also aimed to produce models that could be used clinically to estimate the functional outcome at one year following surgery.
METHODS: A thirteen-year observational cohort study of 163 consecutive patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for a proximal humeral fracture was performed. Twenty-five patients died or were lost to follow-up in the first year after treatment, leaving 138 patients who had assessment of shoulder function with use of the modified Constant score at one year postinjury.
RESULTS: The overall rate of prosthetic survival was 96.9% at one year, 95.3% at five years, and 93.9% at ten years. The overall median modified Constant score was 64 points at one year, with a typically good score for pain relief (median, 15 points) and poorer scores, with a greater scatter of values, for function (median, 12 points), range of motion (median, 24 points), and muscle power (median, 14 points). Of the factors that were assessed immediately after the injury, only patient age, the presence of a neurological deficit, tobacco usage, and alcohol consumption were significantly predictive of the one-year Constant score (p < 0.05). Of the factors that were assessed at six weeks postinjury, those that predicted the one-year Constant score included the age of the patient, the presence of a persistent neurological deficit, the need for an early reoperation, the degree of displacement of the prosthetic head from the central axis of the glenoid seen radiographically, and the degree of displacement of the tuberosities seen radiographically.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary shoulder hemiarthroplasty performed for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture in medically fit and cooperative adults is associated with satisfactory prosthetic survival at an average of 6.3 years. Although the shoulder is usually free of pain following this procedure, the overall functional result, in terms of range of motion, function, and power, at one year varies. A good functional outcome can be anticipated for a younger individual who has no preoperative neurological deficit, no postoperative complications, and a satisfactory radiographic appearance of the shoulder at six weeks. The results are poorer in the larger group of elderly patients who undergo this procedure, especially if they have a neurological deficit, a postoperative complication requiring a reoperation, or an eccentrically located prosthesis with retracted tuberosities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851345     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  83 in total

1.  Open reduction and internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty in the management of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Robert Thorsness; James Iannuzzi; Katia Noyes; Stephen Kates; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

2.  Proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Mark J Jo; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

3.  Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: an update on indications, technique, results and complication rates.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mattei; Stefano Mortera; Chiara Arrigoni; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

4.  Complications in shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 485 cases.

Authors:  Peter R Aldinger; Patric Raiss; Markus Rickert; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complex humeral fractures: a 5 to 10-year follow-up retrospective study.

Authors:  M Giovale; T Mangano; E Rodà; I Repetto; P Cerruti; E Kuqi; F Franchin
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

6.  [Complex proximal humerus fractures--management with a humeral head prosthesis? Clinical and radiological results of a prospective study].

Authors:  P Gierer; C Simon; G Gradl; A Ewert; A Vasarhelyi; M Beck; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in diabetic patients as assessed by peri-operative A1C.

Authors:  Joseph M Statz; Eric R Wagner; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Prostheses for fractures of the proximal humerus: presentation of current results of anatomical fracture shoulder prosthesis under consideration of alternative concepts].

Authors:  G Pape; L Tonne; P Raiss; M Loew; F Zeifang
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  The use of locking plates in proximal humeral fractures: Comparison of outcome by patient age and fracture pattern.

Authors:  Michael Leonard; Leibo Mokotedi; Uthman Alao; Aaron Glynn; Mark Dolan; Pat Fleming
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2009-10

10.  Effect of osteosynthesis, primary hemiarthroplasty, and non-surgical management for displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly: a multi-centre, randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Bo Sanderhoff Olsen; Lars Henrik Frich; Steen Lund Jensen; Hans Viggo Johannsen; Anne Kathrine Sørensen; Asbjørn Hrobjartsson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.