Literature DB >> 22321039

Discharge disposition after pancreatic resection for malignancy: analysis of national trends.

Bhavin C Shah1, Lynette M Smith, Fred Ullrich, Chandrakanth Are.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to analyse national trends in discharge disposition following pancreatic resection for malignancy in the USA.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for 1993-2005 to identify patients who underwent pancreatic resection for malignancy. The status of patients at discharge (to home, home with home health care or to another facility) was noted.
RESULTS: A weighted total of 51 866 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for malignant neoplasm of the pancreas were identified. Patients who died in the postoperative period and patients without a specified discharge disposition were excluded, leaving 43 603 patients for inclusion in the study. Overall mortality improved over the period of the study from 7.1% in 1993 to 5.2% in 2005. The number of patients discharged to another facility increased significantly from 5.5% in 1993 to 13.3% in 2005. Similarly, the number of patients discharged to home with home health assistance increased from 20.0% in 1993 to 33.0% in 2005. This corresponded with a statistically significant decrease in the number of patients discharged to home without assistance, from 74.5% in 1993 to 53.7% in 2005 (P= 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study demonstrate that following pancreatic resection for malignancy, nearly half the patients will require some assistance after discharge.
© 2012 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22321039      PMCID: PMC3371203          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  30 in total

1.  1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Christina Heukaufer; Gerd Antes; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly.

Authors:  Martin A Makary; Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; David Chang; Steven C Cunningham; Taylor S Riall; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Complications after resection of biliopancreatic cancer.

Authors:  D J Gouma; T M van Gulik; L T de Wit; H Obertop
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; J Coleman; P K Sauter; R H Hruban; H A Pitt; K D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients.

Authors:  Stefania Brozzetti; Gianluca Mazzoni; Michelangelo Miccini; Francesco Puma; Monica De Angelis; Diletta Cassini; Elia Bettelli; Adriano Tocchi; Antonino Cavallaro
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-02

9.  Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective.

Authors:  James T McPhee; Joshua S Hill; Giles F Whalen; Maksim Zayaruzny; Demetrius E Litwin; Mary E Sullivan; Frederick A Anderson; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians?

Authors:  T A Sohn; C J Yeo; J L Cameron; K D Lillemoe; M A Talamini; R H Hruban; P K Sauter; J Coleman; S E Ord; L B Grochow; R A Abrams; H A Pitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Update on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer in Older Adults.

Authors:  Shin Yin Lee; Moussa Sissoko; Kevan L Hartshorn
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Association of discharge home with home health care and 30-day readmission after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Dominic E Sanford; Margaret A Olsen; Kerry M Bommarito; Manish Shah; Ryan C Fields; William G Hawkins; David P Jaques; David C Linehan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Impact of Post-Discharge Disposition on Risk and Causes of Readmission Following Liver and Pancreas Surgery.

Authors:  Qinyu Chen; Katiuscha Merath; Griffin Olsen; Fabio Bagante; Jay J Idrees; Ozgur Akgul; Jordan Cloyd; Carl Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff; Eliza W Beal; Susan White; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Readmission following pancreatectomy: what can be improved?

Authors:  Charity C Glass; Stephen P Gondek; Charles M Vollmer; Mark P Callery; Tara S Kent
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Results of pancreatic surgery in the elderly: is age a barrier?

Authors:  Melissa Oliveira-Cunha; Deep J Malde; Amer Aldouri; Gareth Morris-Stiff; Krishna V Menon; Andrew Malvern Smith
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Simplified preoperative tool predicting discharge destination after major oncologic gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Rajesh Ramanathan; Caroline Rieser; Saba Kurtom; Salem Rustom; Revathy Subramany; Luke G Wolfe; Brian J Kaplan
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.454

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.