CONTEXT: The trace elements cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn) and nickel (Ni) are normally present at low concentrations in blood. There has been a concern that stainless steel venepuncture needles typically used for collection of blood samples may contaminate these samples, leading to the masking of deficiency states or causing potential clinical confusion as to whether an individual has a "toxic" concentration. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is any difference between the concentrations of the trace elements obtained by different methods of blood sampling. METHODS: We took blood samples using a standard venepuncture needle, a "butterfly" winged infusion needle (three consecutive samples) and a plastic intravenous cannula (three consecutive samples) from 10 healthy volunteers. We measured the concentrations of Co, Cr, Mn and Ni in the samples using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry, and used analysis of variance (ANOVA) to investigate if there was any difference between the methods of blood sampling. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation blood metal concentrations were: Co 0.33 ± 0.2 μg/l, Cr 2.43 ± 1.55 μg/l, Mn 8.07 ± 7.74 μg/l and Ni 10.4 ± 4.69 μg/l. There was considerable variation between blood metal concentrations of individual subjects and a few sporadic high values. By ANOVA, there was no significant difference between the metal concentrations measured using different methods of blood collection. CONCLUSIONS: It is not necessary to routinely use a plastic cannula for blood sampling for trace element analysis. However, it is possible that sporadic contamination due to stainless steel needles may occur, so we would recommend that unexpected high concentrations are verified by taking a second sample taken through a plastic cannula.
CONTEXT: The trace elements cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn) and nickel (Ni) are normally present at low concentrations in blood. There has been a concern that stainless steel venepuncture needles typically used for collection of blood samples may contaminate these samples, leading to the masking of deficiency states or causing potential clinical confusion as to whether an individual has a "toxic" concentration. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is any difference between the concentrations of the trace elements obtained by different methods of blood sampling. METHODS: We took blood samples using a standard venepuncture needle, a "butterfly" winged infusion needle (three consecutive samples) and a plastic intravenous cannula (three consecutive samples) from 10 healthy volunteers. We measured the concentrations of Co, Cr, Mn and Ni in the samples using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry, and used analysis of variance (ANOVA) to investigate if there was any difference between the methods of blood sampling. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation blood metal concentrations were: Co 0.33 ± 0.2 μg/l, Cr 2.43 ± 1.55 μg/l, Mn 8.07 ± 7.74 μg/l and Ni 10.4 ± 4.69 μg/l. There was considerable variation between blood metal concentrations of individual subjects and a few sporadic high values. By ANOVA, there was no significant difference between the metal concentrations measured using different methods of blood collection. CONCLUSIONS: It is not necessary to routinely use a plastic cannula for blood sampling for trace element analysis. However, it is possible that sporadic contamination due to stainless steel needles may occur, so we would recommend that unexpected high concentrations are verified by taking a second sample taken through a plastic cannula.
Authors: Rim Khlifi; Pablo Olmedo; Fernando Gil; Bouthaina Hammami; Amel Hamza-Chaffai Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Rim Khlifi; Pablo Olmedo; Fernando Gil; Molka Feki-Tounsi; Amine Chakroun; Ahmed Rebai; Amel Hamza-Chaffai Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Rim Khlifi; Pablo Olmedo; Fernando Gil; Amine Chakroun; Amel Hamza-Chaffai Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Rim Khlifi; Pablo Olmedo; Fernando Gil; Molka Feki-Tounsi; Bouthaina Hammami; Ahmed Rebai; Amel Hamza-Chaffai Journal: Environ Monit Assess Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.513
Authors: Yuliya L Sommer; Cynthia D Ward; Joaudimir Castro Georgi; Po-Yung Cheng; Robert L Jones Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 3.367