Literature DB >> 22319101

The benefits of planar circular mouths on suction feeding performance.

Tyler Skorczewski1, Angela Cheer, Peter C Wainwright.   

Abstract

Suction feeding is the most common form of prey capture across aquatic feeding vertebrates and many adaptations that enhance efficiency and performance are expected. Many suction feeders have mechanisms that allow the mouth to form a planar and near-circular opening that is believed to have beneficial hydrodynamic effects. We explore the effects of the flattened and circular mouth opening through computational fluid dynamics simulations that allow comparisons with other mouth profiles. Compared to mouths with lateral notches, we find that the planar mouth opening results in higher flow rates into the mouth and a region of highest flow that is positioned at the centre of the mouth aperture. Planar mouths provide not only for better total fluid flow rates through the mouth but also through the centre of the mouth near where suction feeders position their prey. Circular mouths are shown to provide the quickest capture times for spherical and elliptical prey because they expose the prey item to a large region of high flow. Planar and circular mouths result in higher flow velocities with peak flow located at the centre of the mouth opening and they maximize the capacity of the suction feeders to exert hydrodynamic forces on the prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22319101      PMCID: PMC3385762          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  12 in total

Review 1.  Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Anterior-to-posterior wave of buccal expansion in suction feeding fishes is critical for optimizing fluid flow velocity profile.

Authors:  Kristin L Bishop; Peter C Wainwright; Roi Holzman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Use of computational fluid dynamics to study forces exerted on prey by aquatic suction feeders.

Authors:  Tyler Skorczewski; Angela Cheer; Samson Cheung; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Suction feeding mechanics, performance, and diversity in fishes.

Authors:  Peter Wainwright; Andrew M Carroll; David C Collar; Steven W Day; Timothy E Higham; Roi A Holzman
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  Linking cranial kinematics, buccal pressure, and suction feeding performance in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Richard Svanbäck; Peter C Wainwright; Lara A Ferry-Graham
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.247

6.  Timing is everything: coordination of strike kinematics affects the force exerted by suction feeding fish on attached prey.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Steven W Day; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Integrating the determinants of suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Steven W Day; Rita S Mehta; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Hydrodynamic constraints on prey-capture performance in forward-striking snakes.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Jonathan Brecko; Peter Aerts; Ilona Stouten; Gwen Vanheusden; Andy Camps; Raoul Van Damme; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Do flatfish feed like other fishes? A comparative study of percomorph prey-capture kinematics.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Use of sonomicrometry demonstrates the link between prey capture kinematics and suction pressure in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Christopher P J Sanford; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  Replicated divergence in cichlid radiations mirrors a major vertebrate innovation.

Authors:  Matthew D McGee; Brant C Faircloth; Samuel R Borstein; Jimmy Zheng; C Darrin Hulsey; Peter C Wainwright; Michael E Alfaro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Musculoskeletal architecture of the prey capture apparatus in salamandrid newts with multiphasic lifestyle: does anatomy change during the seasonal habitat switches?

Authors:  Egon Heiss; Stephan Handschuh; Peter Aerts; Sam Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Terrestrial capture of prey by the reedfish, a model species for stem tetrapods.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Christoffel Bonte; Krijn B Michel
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Hydrodynamic performance of suction feeding is virtually unaffected by variation in the shape of the posterior region of the pharynx in fish.

Authors:  Pauline Provini; Sam Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  In vivo intraoral waterflow quantification reveals hidden mechanisms of suction feeding in fish.

Authors:  Pauline Provini; Alexandre Brunet; Andréa Filippo; Sam Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Phenotypic flexibility of gape anatomy fine-tunes the aquatic prey-capture system of newts.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Egon Heiss
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.