Literature DB >> 19828500

Hydrodynamic constraints on prey-capture performance in forward-striking snakes.

Sam Van Wassenbergh1, Jonathan Brecko, Peter Aerts, Ilona Stouten, Gwen Vanheusden, Andy Camps, Raoul Van Damme, Anthony Herrel.   

Abstract

Some specialized aquatic snakes such as Natrix tessellata strike at fish by rapidly accelerating their head towards the prey with their mouth opened widely. This strategy is believed to be suboptimal as relatively high drag forces act on the open jaws and, therefore, probably limit strike speed. Moreover, the bow wave in front of the snake's jaws could push prey away from the mouth, thus potentially explaining the relatively low capture success observed in these animals (<20%). Here, we used laser-scan based computational fluid dynamics to test these potential constraints on prey-capture performance for N. tessellata. Our simulations showed that drag force indeed increases drastically for striking at a high gape angle. However, we estimated the overall cost in slowing down strike speed to be less pronounced due to the instationary dynamics of the system. In contrast to the expectations, forward displacement of prey was relatively limited (<13% of head length), and forceful collisions between prey and the leading edge of the jaw regularly occurred. However, our models showed that precise aiming by the snake was needed to reduce the chance of deviating the prey to a path bypassing the mouth. Our study also indicated several hydrodynamic advantages for snakes to strike at relatively large prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19828500      PMCID: PMC2874232          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  13 in total

Review 1.  Living in a physical world II. The bio-ballistics of small projectiles.

Authors:  Steven Vogel
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Using computational fluid dynamics to calculate the stimulus to the lateral line of a fish in still water.

Authors:  Mark A Rapo; Houshuo Jiang; Mark A Grosenbaugh; Sheryl Coombs
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Why snakes have forked tongues.

Authors:  K Schwenk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Are ontogenetic shifts in diet linked to shifts in feeding mechanics? Scaling of the feeding apparatus in the banded watersnake Nerodia fasciata.

Authors:  Shawn E Vincent; Brad R Moon; Anthony Herrel; Nathan J Kley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Sweeping and striking: a kinematic study of the trunk during prey capture in three thamnophiine snakes.

Authors:  Michael E Alfaro
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Timing is everything: coordination of strike kinematics affects the force exerted by suction feeding fish on attached prey.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Steven W Day; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Feeding kinematics, suction and hydraulic jetting capabilities in bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus).

Authors:  Christopher D Marshall; Kit M Kovacs; Christian Lydersen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Larval zebrafish rapidly sense the water flow of a predator's strike.

Authors:  M J McHenry; K E Feitl; J A Strother; W J Van Trump
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Integrating the determinants of suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Steven W Day; Rita S Mehta; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  The benefits of planar circular mouths on suction feeding performance.

Authors:  Tyler Skorczewski; Angela Cheer; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Repeated evolution of drag reduction at the air-water interface in diving kingfishers.

Authors:  K E Crandell; R O Howe; P L Falkingham
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Does aquatic foraging impact head shape evolution in snakes?

Authors:  Marion Segall; Raphaël Cornette; Anne-Claire Fabre; Ramiro Godoy-Diana; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Hydrodynamic Simulations of the Performance Landscape for Suction-Feeding Fishes Reveal Multiple Peaks for Different Prey Types.

Authors:  Karin H Olsson; Christopher H Martin; Roi Holzman
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  Environment-dependent prey capture in the Atlantic mudskipper (Periophthalmus barbarus).

Authors:  K B Michel; P Aerts; S Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.422

6.  Increasing morphological disparity and decreasing optimality for jaw speed and strength during the radiation of jawed vertebrates.

Authors:  William J Deakin; Philip S L Anderson; Wendy den Boer; Thomas J Smith; Jennifer J Hill; Martin Rücklin; Philip C J Donoghue; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 14.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.