Literature DB >> 22317929

Re-operation for failed gastro-esophageal fundoplication. What results to expect?

J C Vignal1, G Luc, T Wagner, A Sa Cunha, D Collet.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study is to evaluate short and medium term results of re-operation for failed fundoplication in a retrospective monocentric cohort of 47 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 2011, 595 patients underwent a laparoscopic primary fundoplication (PFP) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). During the same period, 47 patients required a re-operative fundoplication (RFP). In 11 patients, the original wrap had herniated into the thorax. All these revisions consisted of a complete takedown of the original wrap before constructing a tension-free wrap using a standardized technique. Patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years were matched to patients who had been operated only once to assess satisfaction and quality of life.
RESULTS: Short term: All patients were operated by laparoscopy with no conversion. There was no mortality. Two postoperative complications necessitating re-operation were observed (morbidity 4.3%): one complete aphagia and one gastric perforation. Long term: 29 re-operated patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years (mean: 4,5 years) (Group RFP) were compared to a matched group of 29 patients operated only once (Group PFP). These groups were comparable in age, sex ratio, BMI and follow-up. In both groups, all patients were operated by laparoscopy without conversion. Morbidity was 3.5% in the RFP group, none in the PFP group. There was no mortality in either group. The length of stay and operative time were significantly higher in the RFP group (4.6 vs. 2.6 days, p<0.05). Two RFP patients (5%) required re-operation at three and seven months vs. none in the PFP group. The long-term satisfaction was comparable in the two groups (78% vs. 85%, p=NS). Quality of life assessed by the GIQLI was significantly better in the PFP group (104 vs. 84, p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Re-do fundoplication is a safe procedure and is feasible by laparoscopy. In the long-term, patient satisfaction is comparable to primary intervention with, however, a slightly poorer quality of life. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22317929     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Visc Surg        ISSN: 1878-7886            Impact factor:   2.043


  4 in total

1.  Does BMI predict recurrence or complications after reoperative reflux surgery? Review of a single center's experience and a comparison of outcomes.

Authors:  E Wakeam; J Wee; A Lebenthal; S O Ali; R J Gilbert; R Bueno
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Endoluminal Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: In Between the Pill and the Knife?

Authors:  Tony S Brar; Peter V Draganov; Dennis Yang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Laparoscopic redo fundoplication improves disease-specific and global quality of life following failed laparoscopic or open fundoplication.

Authors:  Sara E Martin Del Campo; Sara A Mansfield; Andrew J Suzo; Jeffrey W Hazey; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) After Redo-Fundoplication.

Authors:  Antti J Kivelä; Juha Kauppi; Jari Räsänen; Anna But; Harri Sintonen; Jaana Vironen; Olli Kruuna; Tom Scheinin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.