J R Strosberg1, J M Weber2, J Choi3, T L Campos2, T L Valone2, G Han4, M J Schell4, L K Kvols2. 1. Departments of Gastrointestinal Oncology. Electronic address: jonathan.strosberg@moffitt.org. 2. Departments of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 3. Departments of Interventional Radiology. 4. Departments of Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The liver is the predominant site of metastases among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Prior retrospective studies have reported high response rates in patients treated with transarterial embolization (TAE). NETs are highly vascular and are known to express vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). We hypothesized that administration of sunitinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, following TAE would extend progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic NETs to the liver underwent a series of selective TAEs followed by sunitinib (until disease progression or maximum of 12 months). Radiographic response (by RECIST), survival, and safety parameters were monitored. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.86]. Median PFS was 15.2 months. Rates of overall survival (OS) at 1 and 4 years were 95% (95% CI, 0.88-1.00) and 59% (95% CI, 0.38-0.80), respectively. A significant 34% rise in serum VEGF was observed following the initial TAE (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic TAE is a highly active treatment option for patients with metastatic NETs to the liver. Embolization stimulates release of VEGF into the circulation. Sunitinib, an oral VEGFR inhibitor, can be safely administered following embolization. The high rates of PFS and OS associated with this sequence of therapies are encouraging.
BACKGROUND: The liver is the predominant site of metastases among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Prior retrospective studies have reported high response rates in patients treated with transarterial embolization (TAE). NETs are highly vascular and are known to express vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). We hypothesized that administration of sunitinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, following TAE would extend progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic NETs to the liver underwent a series of selective TAEs followed by sunitinib (until disease progression or maximum of 12 months). Radiographic response (by RECIST), survival, and safety parameters were monitored. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.86]. Median PFS was 15.2 months. Rates of overall survival (OS) at 1 and 4 years were 95% (95% CI, 0.88-1.00) and 59% (95% CI, 0.38-0.80), respectively. A significant 34% rise in serum VEGF was observed following the initial TAE (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic TAE is a highly active treatment option for patients with metastatic NETs to the liver. Embolization stimulates release of VEGF into the circulation. Sunitinib, an oral VEGFR inhibitor, can be safely administered following embolization. The high rates of PFS and OS associated with this sequence of therapies are encouraging.
Authors: James C Yao; Manisha H Shah; Tetsuhide Ito; Catherine Lombard Bohas; Edward M Wolin; Eric Van Cutsem; Timothy J Hobday; Takuji Okusaka; Jaume Capdevila; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Paola Tomassetti; Marianne E Pavel; Sakina Hoosen; Tomas Haas; Jeremie Lincy; David Lebwohl; Kjell Öberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Juan M Sarmiento; Glenroy Heywood; Joseph Rubin; Duane M Ilstrup; David M Nagorney; Florencia G Que Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Dirk B Mendel; A Douglas Laird; Xiaohua Xin; Sharianne G Louie; James G Christensen; Guangmin Li; Randall E Schreck; Tinya J Abrams; Theresa J Ngai; Leslie B Lee; Lesley J Murray; Jeremy Carver; Emily Chan; Katherine G Moss; Joshua O Haznedar; Juthamas Sukbuntherng; Robert A Blake; Li Sun; Cho Tang; Todd Miller; Sheri Shirazian; Gerald McMahon; Julie M Cherrington Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: E Therasse; F Breittmayer; A Roche; T De Baere; S Indushekar; M Ducreux; P Lasser; D Elias; P Rougier Journal: Radiology Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sanjay Gupta; James C Yao; Kamran Ahrar; Michael J Wallace; Frank A Morello; David C Madoff; Ravi Murthy; Marshall E Hicks; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Cancer J Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: Mark Bloomston; Osama Al-Saif; Dori Klemanski; Joseph J Pinzone; Edward W Martin; Bryan Palmer; Gregory Guy; Hooman Khabiri; E Christopher Ellison; Manisha H Shah Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Julia Dai; Viswanath R Belum; Shenhong Wu; Vincent Sibaud; Mario E Lacouture Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Benjamin Carlisle; Nadine Demko; Georgina Freeman; Amanda Hakala; Nathalie MacKinnon; Tim Ramsay; Spencer Hey; Alex John London; Jonathan Kimmelman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-11-07 Impact factor: 13.506