Literature DB >> 12967136

Hepatic artery embolization and chemoembolization for treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors: the M.D. Anderson experience.

Sanjay Gupta1, James C Yao, Kamran Ahrar, Michael J Wallace, Frank A Morello, David C Madoff, Ravi Murthy, Marshall E Hicks, Jaffer A Ajani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carcinoid tumors have a predilection for metastasizing to the liver. The presence of liver metastases is associated with poor prognosis and also results in significant deterioration of patient's quality of life. Several reports suggest that hepatic artery embolization or chemoembolization can be used for control of liver disease in these patients. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with the use of hepatic arterial embolization or chemoembolization in patients with liver-dominant metastatic carcinoid disease, evaluating the clinical and radiologic response rates, duration of response, and progression-free and overall survival rates of these patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients with carcinoid tumors metastatic to the liver who underwent hepatic artery embolization or chemoembolization between January 1992 and December 2000 were reviewed. For the purposes of this study, we compared the follow-up computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with the baseline imaging to determine each patient's objective tumor response. The interval between the dates of response and disease progression was considered the response duration. Progression-free survival duration was calculated from the date of initial treatment to the date disease progression was recorded or the date of death. Survival durations were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (48 men and 33 women; age range, 38-79 years) were included in this study. The mean duration of disease from the initial discovery of liver metastases until embolization was 24.5 months. Fifty patients were treated with bland hepatic artery embolization, and 31 underwent chemoembolization. Of the 69 patients in whom radiologic response could be evaluated, partial response was observed in 46 patients (67%), minimal response (MR) in six (8.7%), stable disease in 11 (16%), and progressive disease in six (8.7%). The median duration of response in the 42 patients with partial response was 17 months (range, 4-51 months). Sixty-three percent of patients had a reduction in their tumor-related symptoms. The median progression-free survival duration was 19 months (95% confidence interval, 17-21 months); the probability of progression-free survival was 75%, 35%, and 11% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The median overall survival time was 31 months (95% confidence interval, 23-38 months); the survival probability was 93% at 1 year, 62% at 2 years, and 24% at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic arterial occlusive therapy using hepatic artery embolization or chemoembolization results in symptomatic and radiologic response in most patients with carcinoid metastases in the liver. The progression-free survival of 19 months achieved with embolization in our study is encouraging, given that most patients had extensive liver involvement and had shown disease progression while receiving systemic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12967136     DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200307000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  55 in total

1.  NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas.

Authors:  Matthew H Kulke; Lowell B Anthony; David L Bushnell; Wouter W de Herder; Stanley J Goldsmith; David S Klimstra; Stephen J Marx; Janice L Pasieka; Rodney F Pommier; James C Yao; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 2.  Colorectal liver metastases: regional chemotherapy via transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic chemoperfusion: an update.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Stephan Zangos; Katrin Eichler; Danny Yakoub; Mohamed Nabil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Diagnosis and treatment in intestinal carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  Babs G Taal
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-02

4.  A phase II clinical trial of sunitinib following hepatic transarterial embolization for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  J R Strosberg; J M Weber; J Choi; T L Campos; T L Valone; G Han; M J Schell; L K Kvols
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Palliative management strategies of advanced gastrointestinal carcinoid neoplasms.

Authors:  Paola Sartori; Chiara Mussi; Carlo Angelini; Stefano Crippa; Roberto Caprotti; Franco Uggeri
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Repeat transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for progressive hepatic carcinoid metastases provides results similar to first TACE.

Authors:  Kimberly A Varker; Edward W Martin; Dori Klemanski; Bryan Palmer; Manisha H Shah; Mark Bloomston
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Emerging therapies and latest development in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an update for clinicians.

Authors:  Jaya Sharma; Marvin Duque; M Wasif Saif
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 8.  Intra-arterial liver-directed therapies for neuroendocrine hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 9.  Advances in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Matthew Kulke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-09

Review 10.  Emerging approaches in the management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis: role of liver-directed and systemic therapies.

Authors:  Skye C Mayo; Joseph M Herman; David Cosgrove; Nik Bhagat; Ihab Kamel; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.