OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess follow-up dental care received by children given baseline screening and referrals as part of an ongoing clinical trial. METHODS: A retrospective study with two cohorts of kindergarten children who had baseline and follow-up (9 months later) dental exams was used. The parents/caregivers of children with routine restorative or urgent needs at baseline received a referral letter and telephone reminders to seek care for their child. Children with referrals were evaluated at follow-up exam for the receipt of care. A baseline caregiver questionnaire provided information on the individual and family characteristics of the children. RESULTS: A total of 303 children had dental exams at both time periods. At baseline, 42 percent (126/303) received referrals and among the referred group19 percent (24/126) received follow-up care. A greater proportion with urgent referrals (10/30, 33 percent) received care than those with routine referrals (14/96, 15 percent). Baseline dmft decayed, missing, filled primary teeth and DMFT decayed, missing, filled permanent teeth was similar between children who did/did not receive follow-up care (P = 0.178 and 0.491, respectively). Children receiving referrals had caregivers with less education, higher Medicaid participation, fewer routine care visits, poorer self-rating of teeth, and a higher proportion of children reporting tooth pain. Children without receipt of follow-up care had caregivers who were more likely to report not visiting a dentist within the last 5 years and a greater number of missed days from work because of tooth problems. CONCLUSION: The rate of dental utilization was low even with school screening, referral and parental reminders among poor, largely minority inner-city kindergarten children.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess follow-up dental care received by children given baseline screening and referrals as part of an ongoing clinical trial. METHODS: A retrospective study with two cohorts of kindergarten children who had baseline and follow-up (9 months later) dental exams was used. The parents/caregivers of children with routine restorative or urgent needs at baseline received a referral letter and telephone reminders to seek care for their child. Children with referrals were evaluated at follow-up exam for the receipt of care. A baseline caregiver questionnaire provided information on the individual and family characteristics of the children. RESULTS: A total of 303 children had dental exams at both time periods. At baseline, 42 percent (126/303) received referrals and among the referred group19 percent (24/126) received follow-up care. A greater proportion with urgent referrals (10/30, 33 percent) received care than those with routine referrals (14/96, 15 percent). Baseline dmft decayed, missing, filled primary teeth and DMFT decayed, missing, filled permanent teeth was similar between children who did/did not receive follow-up care (P = 0.178 and 0.491, respectively). Children receiving referrals had caregivers with less education, higher Medicaid participation, fewer routine care visits, poorer self-rating of teeth, and a higher proportion of children reporting tooth pain. Children without receipt of follow-up care had caregivers who were more likely to report not visiting a dentist within the last 5 years and a greater number of missed days from work because of tooth problems. CONCLUSION: The rate of dental utilization was low even with school screening, referral and parental reminders among poor, largely minority inner-city kindergarten children.
Authors: K Milsom; A Blinkhorn; H Worthington; A Threlfall; K Buchanan; P Kearney-Mitchell; M Tickle Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: K M Milsom; A G Threlfall; A S Blinkhorn; P I Kearney-Mitchell; K M Buchanan; M Tickle Journal: Br Dent J Date: 2006-06-24 Impact factor: 1.626
Authors: S Nelson; H Eggertsson; B Powell; J Mandelaris; M Ntragatakis; T Richardson; G Ferretti Journal: Community Dent Health Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 1.349
Authors: David Selvaraj; Shelley Curtan; Tashyana Copeland; Erin McNamee; Jelena Debelnogich; Taylor Kula; Hasina Momotaz; Suchitra Nelson Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 1.821
Authors: Joana Cunha-Cruz; Peter Milgrom; R Michael Shirtcliff; Howard L Bailit; Colleen E Huebner; Douglas Conrad; Sharity Ludwig; Melissa Mitchell; Jeanne Dysert; Gary Allen; JoAnna Scott; Lloyd Mancl Journal: Trials Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Dominique H Como; Leah I Stein Duker; José C Polido; Sharon A Cermak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 3.390