Literature DB >> 16799446

The effectiveness of school dental screening: dental attendance and treatment of those screened positive.

K M Milsom1, A G Threlfall, A S Blinkhorn, P I Kearney-Mitchell, K M Buchanan, M Tickle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine dental attendance and treatment outcomes following two models of dental screening.
DESIGN: An observational prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Infant, primary and junior schools in the North West of England.
SUBJECTS: Children aged six to nine years at the start of the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received a screening examination according to either a 'Traditional model' or 'New model' of school dental screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attendance at a dentist within four months of the intervention and treatment received by children referred via the 'New model' with caries in their permanent teeth.
RESULTS: In the 'New model' of school dental screening 46% of screened positive and 41% of screened negative children attended a dentist during the study period. Some 44% of children referred with caries in permanent teeth attended a dentist and 53% of those attending received treatment for the referred condition. Larger proportions of children from disadvantaged backgrounds were screened positive but higher proportions of children from more affluent backgrounds attended the dentist and subsequently received treatment.
CONCLUSION: School dental screening has a minimal impact on dental attendance and only a small proportion of screened positive children receive appropriate treatment. The programme fails to reduce inequalities in utilisation of dental services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16799446     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  9 in total

1.  School screening and parental reminders in increasing dental care for children in need: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Suchitra Nelson; Jason Mandelaris; Gerald Ferretti; Masahiro Heima; Charles Spiekerman; Peter Milgrom
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 1.821

2.  Levels of oral disease in a sample of children with disability; a study carried out prior to comprehensive dental treatment under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  I O'Leary; M Kinirons; C Stewart; F Graham; C Hartnett
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2007-09

Review 3.  School dental screening programmes for oral health.

Authors:  Ankita Arora; Shivi Khattri; Noorliza Mastura Ismail; Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Eachempati Prashanti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-21

Review 4.  School dental screening programmes for oral health.

Authors:  Ankita Arora; Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Shivi Khattri; Noorliza Mastura Ismail; Prashanti Eachempati
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-27

5.  Family Access to a Dentist Study (FADS): A multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Suchitra Nelson; Christine Riedy; Jeffrey M Albert; Wonik Lee; Mary Beth Slusar; Shelley Curtan; Gerald Ferretti; Joana Cunha-Cruz; Peter Milgrom
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Validation of a multifactorial risk factor model used for predicting future caries risk with Nevada adolescents.

Authors:  Marcia M Ditmyer; Georgia Dounis; Katherine M Howard; Connie Mobley; David Cappelli
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  School dental screening programmes for oral health.

Authors:  Ankita Arora; Shivi Khattri; Noorliza Mastura Ismail; Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-08

8.  A randomised control trial of the effectiveness of personalised letters sent subsequent to school dental inspections in increasing registration in unregistered children.

Authors:  Chris J Cunningham; Rob Elton; Gail V A Topping
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  The CATFISH study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme.

Authors:  Michaela Goodwin; Richard Emsley; Michael Kelly; Eric Rooney; Matthew Sutton; Martin Tickle; Rebecca Wagstaff; Tanya Walsh; William Whittaker; Iain A Pretty
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.757

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.