Literature DB >> 22316153

The challenges involved in modeling toxicity data in silico: a review.

M Paul Gleeson1, Sandeep Modi, Andreas Bender, Richard L Marchese Robinson, Johannes Kirchmair, Malinee Promkatkaew, Supa Hannongbua, Robert C Glen.   

Abstract

The percentage of failures in late pharmaceutical development due to toxicity has increased dramatically over the last decade or so, resulting in increased demand for new methods to rapidly and reliably predict the toxicity of compounds. In this review we discuss the challenges involved in both the building of in silico models on toxicology endpoints and their practical use in decision making. In particular, we will reflect upon the predictive strength of a number of different in silico models for a range of different endpoints, different approaches used to generate the models or rules, and limitations of the methods and the data used in model generation. Given that there exists no unique definition of a 'good' model, we will furthermore highlight the need to balance model complexity/interpretability with predictability, particularly in light of OECD/REACH guidelines. Special emphasis is put on the data and methods used to generate the in silico toxicology models, and their strengths and weaknesses are discussed. Switching to the applied side, we next review a number of toxicity endpoints, discussing the methods available to predict them and their general level of predictability (which very much depends on the endpoint considered). We conclude that, while in silico toxicology is a valuable tool to drug discovery scientists, much still needs to be done to, firstly, understand more completely the biological mechanisms for toxicity and, secondly, to generate more rapid in vitro models to screen compounds. With this biological understanding, and additional data available, our ability to generate more predictive in silico models should significantly improve in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22316153     DOI: 10.2174/138161212799436359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Des        ISSN: 1381-6128            Impact factor:   3.116


  20 in total

Review 1.  Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Andreas H Göller; Dieter Lang; Jens Kunze; Bernard Testa; Ian D Wilson; Robert C Glen; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Combined use of pharmacophoric models together with drug metabolism and genotoxicity "in silico" studies in the hit finding process.

Authors:  Ma José Jerez; Miguel Jerez; Coral González-García; Sara Ballester; Ana Castro
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Integrated in silico approaches for the prediction of Ames test mutagenicity.

Authors:  Sandeep Modi; Jin Li; Sophie Malcomber; Claire Moore; Andrew Scott; Andrew White; Paul Carmichael
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Tuning HERG out: antitarget QSAR models for drug development.

Authors:  Rodolpho C Braga; Vinicius M Alves; Meryck F B Silva; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Alexander Tropsha; Carolina H Andrade
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Integrative approaches for predicting in vivo effects of chemicals from their structural descriptors and the results of short-term biological assays.

Authors:  Yen Sia Low; Alexander Yeugenyevich Sedykh; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  The essential roles of chemistry in high-throughput screening triage.

Authors:  Jayme L Dahlin; Michael A Walters
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.808

Review 8.  Computational prediction of metabolism: sites, products, SAR, P450 enzyme dynamics, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Mark J Williamson; Jonathan D Tyzack; Lu Tan; Peter J Bond; Andreas Bender; Robert C Glen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Integrative chemical-biological read-across approach for chemical hazard classification.

Authors:  Yen Low; Alexander Sedykh; Denis Fourches; Alexander Golbraikh; Maurice Whelan; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  ChemBioSim: Enhancing Conformal Prediction of In Vivo Toxicity by Use of Predicted Bioactivities.

Authors:  Marina Garcia de Lomana; Andrea Morger; Ulf Norinder; Roland Buesen; Robert Landsiedel; Andrea Volkamer; Johannes Kirchmair; Miriam Mathea
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.