| Literature DB >> 22315673 |
Anwar A Al-Nuaim1, Yahya Al-Nakeeb, Mark Lyons, Hazzaa M Al-Hazzaa, Alan Nevill, Peter Collins, Michael J Duncan.
Abstract
Purpose. The aims of this study were to explore the lifestyle of young people living in Al-Ahsa Governorate; to investigate differences due to gender, age, school type, and geographical location. Methods. 1270 volunteered youth (15-19 years) completed a self-report questionnaire that contained 47 items relating to patterns of physical activity (PA), sedentary activity, and eating habits. The questionnaire allows the calculation of total energy expenditure in metabolic equivalent (MET-min) values per week. Results. Significant differences in the PA levels of youth were evident with regard to gender, geographical areas, and type of school. Also, normal weight males reported the highest levels of PA compared to overweight and obese. Conclusions. Youth living in rural desert were less physically active than those living in urban or rural farm environments. Youth of "normal" weight were more active than obese. Males were more active than females and PA levels appeared to decline with age.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22315673 PMCID: PMC3270420 DOI: 10.1155/2012/417589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Mean ± SD of the main dependent variables for the total sample and sub-samples.
| Variable | Urban | Rural farm | Rural desert | Whole group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| Age | 17.03 ± 1.02 | 16.78 ± 1.21 | 17.13 ± 1.25 | 17.50 ± 1.21 | 17.15 ± 1.04 | 17.24 ± 1.35 | 17.08 ± 1.10 | 17.07 ± 1.27 |
| Weight | 70.08 ± 21.62 | 60.47 ± 20.03 | 63.31 ± 18.37 | 54.12 ± 15.51 | 69.10 ± 20.05 | 62.23 ± 18.83 | 67.76 ± 20.62 | 58.74 ± 18.80 |
| Height | 168.6 ± 7.41 | 154.91 ± 9.00 | 166.86 ± 6.61 | 153.75 ± 8.02 | 167.29 ± 6.07 | 154.16 ± 5.74 | 167.86 ± 7.02 | 154.44 ± 8.32 |
| BMI | 24.58 ± 7.18 | 26.35 ± 21.84 | 22.67 ± 6.16 | 23.89 ± 20 | 24.59 ± 6.66 | 26.00 ± 6.84 | 23.97 ± 5.764 | 25.54 ± 19.83 |
| Abdominal Circumference | 78.73 ± 16.87 | 82.47 ± 15.02 | 73.90 ± 14.15 | 78.58 ± 12.65 | 76.36 ± 13.91 | 81.89 ± 15.24 | 76.85 ± 15.79 | 81.17 ± 14.44 |
| Time spent on TV | 2.60 ± 1.81 | 2.28 ± 1.67 | 2.29 ± 1.62 | 2.71 ± 1.97 | 2.48 ± 2.13 | 3.63 ± 2.20 | 2.49 ± 1.80 | 2.60 ± 1.90 |
| Time spent on computer | 2.58 ± 2.02 | 3.57 ± 2.45 | 2.34 ± 2.05 | 2.98 ± 2.29 | 1.96 ± 2.26 | 2.12 ± 2.09 | 2.43 ± 2.07 | 3.19 ± 2.40 |
| Total METs min/week (vigorous) | 1780 ± 2037 | 112 ± 76 | 1653 ± 2066 | 176 ± 410 | 1286 ± 1448 | 64 ± 41 | 1678 ± 1987 | 125 ± 232 |
| Total METs min/week (moderate) | 702 ± 772 | 475 ± 409 | 740 ± 841 | 696 ± 584 | 368 ± 358 | 540 ± 394 | 676 ± 769 | 564 ± 490 |
Figure 1Total METs per week in males and females across different age groups. **P < 0.001 for differences in METs per week between males and females across each age group.
Figure 2Number of minutes walking per week in males and females. **P < 0.01 for differences in the total number of minutes walking per week between males and females across each age group.
Figure 3Total METs per week for males and females across obesity index.
BMI classifications according to IOTF.
| BMI classification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geographical location | Normal | Overweight | Obese | |
| Urban | Males | 60.5% | 17.6% | 21.9% |
| Females | 62.8% | 16.8% | 20.4% | |
| Both sexes | 61.6% | 17.2% | 21.2% | |
|
| ||||
| Rural farm | Males | 73.3% | 12.6% | 14.1% |
| Females | 71.4% | 17.5% | 11.1% | |
| Both sexes | 72.4% | 14.9% | 12.7% | |
|
| ||||
| Rural desert | Males | 56.5% | 23.5% | 20% |
| Females | 48.8% | 29.8% | 21.4% | |
| Both sexes | 52.7% | 26.6% | 20.7% | |
|
| ||||
| All | Males | 64.1% | 16.8% | 19.1% |
| Females | 63.5% | 18.8% | 17.7% | |
BMI according to geographical location of schools.
| Urban | Rural farm | Rural desert | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Males | 24.58 ± 7.18 | 22.67 ± 6.16 | 24.59 ± 6.66 |
| Females | 26.35 ± 21.84 | 23.89 ± 19.20 | 26.00 ± 6.84 |
Waist circumference classification according to gender and geographical location.
| Subgroups | Waist circumference classification | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban | Rural farm | Rural desert | Total sample | |||||
| Normal | “At risk” | Normal | “At risk” | “Normal” | “At risk” | Normal | “At risk” | |
| Males | 75.3% | 24.7% | 79.7% | 20.3% | 70.2% | 29.8% | 73.5% | 26.5% |
| Females | 49.5% | 50.5% | 49.2% | 50.8% | 40.7% | 59.3% | 45.8% | 54.2% |
| Whole group | 58.5% | 41.5% | 65.4% | 34.6% | 55.8% | 44.2% | 60.3% | 39.7% |
Waist circumference classification according to school type and gender.
| Subgroups | Waist circumference classification | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public | Private | |||
| Normal | “At risk” | Normal | “At risk” | |
| Males | 75.3% | 24.7% | 65.9% | 34.1% |
| Females | 49.5% | 50.5% | 37.5% | 62.5% |
| Whole group | 61.4% | 38.6% | 54.5% | 45.5% |