Literature DB >> 22315471

Standard endoscopy with random biopsies versus narrow band imaging targeted biopsies in Barrett's oesophagus: a prospective, international, randomised controlled trial.

Prateek Sharma1, Robert H Hawes, Ajay Bansal, Neil Gupta, Wouter Curvers, Amit Rastogi, Mandeep Singh, Matt Hall, Sharad C Mathur, Sachin B Wani, Brenda Hoffman, Srinivas Gaddam, Paul Fockens, Jacques J Bergman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: White light endoscopy with random biopsies is the standard for detection of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and neoplasia in patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BO). Narrow band imaging (NBI) highlights surface patterns that correlate with IM and neoplasia in BO.
OBJECTIVE: To compare high-definition white light (HD-WLE) and NBI for detection of IM and neoplasia in BO.
DESIGN: International, randomised, crossover trial comparing HD-WLE and NBI. Patients referred for BO screening/surveillance at three tertiary referral centres were prospectively enrolled and randomised to HD-WLE or NBI followed by other procedures in 3-8 weeks. During HD-WLE, four quadrant biopsies every 2 cm, together with targeted biopsies of visible lesions (Seattle protocol), were obtained. During NBI examination, mucosal and vascular patterns were noted and targeted biopsies were obtained. All biopsies were read by a single expert gastrointestinal pathologist in a blinded fashion.
RESULTS: 123 patients with BO (mean age 61; 93% male; 97% Caucasian) with mean circumferential and maximal extents of 1.8 and 3.6 cm, respectively, were enrolled. Both HD-WLE and NBI detected 104/113 (92%) patients with IM, but NBI required fewer biopsies per patient (3.6 vs 7.6, p<0.0001). NBI detected a higher proportion of areas with dysplasia (30% vs 21%, p=0.01). During examination with NBI, all areas of high-grade dysplasia and cancer had an irregular mucosal or vascular pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: NBI targeted biopsies can have the same IM detection rate as an HD-WLE examination with the Seattle protocol while requiring fewer biopsies. In addition, NBI targeted biopsies can detect more areas with dysplasia. Regular appearing NBI surface patterns did not harbour high-grade dysplasia/cancer, suggesting that biopsies could be avoided in these areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22315471     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  94 in total

1.  Endoscopy: NBI in Barrett esophagus--look more and sample less.

Authors:  Emmanuel C Gorospe; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Multimodal endoscope can quantify wide-field fluorescence detection of Barrett's neoplasia.

Authors:  Bishnu P Joshi; Xiyu Duan; Richard S Kwon; Cyrus Piraka; B Joseph Elmunzer; Shaoying Lu; Emily F Rabinsky; David G Beer; Henry D Appelman; Scott R Owens; Rork Kuick; Nobuyuki Doguchi; D Kim Turgeon; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Label-free multi-photon imaging of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Soroush Mehravar; Bhaskar Banerjee; Hemant Chatrath; Babak Amirsolaimani; Krunal Patel; Charmi Patel; Robert A Norwood; Nasser Peyghambarian; Khanh Kieu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Quantitative evaluation of in vivo vital-dye fluorescence endoscopic imaging for the detection of Barrett's-associated neoplasia.

Authors:  Nadhi Thekkek; Michelle H Lee; Alexandros D Polydorides; Daniel G Rosen; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Assessment of the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of endocytoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: a pilot ex-vivo study.

Authors:  Yutaka Tomizawa; Prasad G Iyer; Louis M Wongkeesong; Navtej S Buttar; Lori S Lutzke; Tsung-Teh Wu; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Molecular markers and imaging tools to identify malignant potential in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Michael Bennett; Hiroshi Mashimo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15

7.  Confocal foveated endomicroscope for the detection of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Adam Shadfan; Anne Hellebust; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Tomasz Tkaczyk
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Feasibility of a simplified narrow-band imaging classification system for Barrett's esophagus for novice endoscopists.

Authors:  Hiroto Furuhashi; Kenichi Goda; Yuichi Shimizu; Masayuki Kato; Masakazu Takahashi; Akira Dobashi; Koji Hirata; Ayane Oba; Taku Shigesawa; Masaki Inoue; Hiroaki Matsui; Chika Kinoshita; Yoshitaka Ando; Masahiro Ikegami; Tadakazu Shimoda; Mototsugu Kato
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  In vivo endomicroscopy improves detection of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a multicenter international randomized controlled trial (with video).

Authors:  Marcia Irene Canto; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; William Brugge; Gary W Falk; Kerry B Dunbar; Zhe Zhang; Kevin Woods; Jose Antonio Almario; Ursula Schell; John Goldblum; Anirban Maitra; Elizabeth Montgomery; Ralf Kiesslich
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  SCREENING FOR BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS WITH PROBE-BASED CONFOCAL LASER ENDOMICROSCOPY VIDEOS.

Authors:  J Vince Pulido; Shan Guleria; Lubaina Ehsan; Tilak Shah; Sana Syed; Don E Brown
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2020-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.