Literature DB >> 22315183

Long-term psychological distress in women at risk for hereditary breast cancer adhering to regular surveillance: a risk profile.

Mariska den Heijer1, Caroline Seynaeve, Kathleen Vanheusden, Reinier Timman, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Madeleine Tilanus-Linthorst, Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers, Aad Tibben.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some women at risk for hereditary breast cancer are at increased risk of psychological distress. In order to tailor support for individual women, the availability of a tool enabling the identification of psychologically vulnerable women at an early stage is warranted. The objectives of this study were (1) to explore long-term psychological distress in women at risk for hereditary breast cancer adhering to regular surveillance, and (2) to identify women being vulnerable for long-term psychological distress, defined in terms of a multifactorial risk profile.
METHODS: General distress and cancer-related distress were assessed at baseline (T0) and after 5-8 years (T1) in 197 high-risk women adhering to breast cancer surveillance. Coping styles, occurrence of breast cancer in the family of origin, breast cancer risk perception, and frequency of breast self-examination, as assessed at T0, were examined as predictor variables for long-term distress (T1).
RESULTS: Across time, women reported a significant reduction in intrusion and avoidance. Intrusion levels were increased among women who had lost a first-degree relative to breast cancer. Predictors of increased long-term distress were passive and palliative coping styles, excessive breast self-examination, and overestimation of breast cancer risk. On the other hand, coping through fostering reassuring thoughts was predictive for decreased long-term distress.
CONCLUSION: On the basis of the identified risk profile, it is possible to identify vulnerable women at an early stage, who then may be offered additional and individually tailored support.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22315183     DOI: 10.1002/pon.3039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  9 in total

1.  Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management for Healthy Women at Risk for Breast Cancer: a Novel Application of a Proven Intervention.

Authors:  Bonnie A McGregor; Emily D Dolan; Karly M Murphy; Timothy S Sannes; Krista B Highland; Denise L Albano; Alison A Ward; Anna M Charbonneau; Mary W Redman; Rachel M Ceballos
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Cost-effectiveness of different strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in German women with a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation.

Authors:  Dirk Müller; Marion Danner; Kerstin Rhiem; Björn Stollenwerk; Christoph Engel; Linda Rasche; Lisa Borsi; Rita Schmutzler; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-04-05

3.  COVID-19 Experiences Predicting High Anxiety and Depression Among a Sample of BRCA1/BRCA2-positive Women in the US.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2021-08-09

4.  Development and Testing of a Decision Aid for Unaffected Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation.

Authors:  Terri Jabaley; Meghan L Underhill-Blazey; Donna L Berry
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Affect regulation as a moderator of intentions for breast cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Doreen M Agnese; Susan T Vadaparampil; Suzanne C O'Neill; Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-03

6.  Prognostic Factors for Distress After Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer.

Authors:  Jan S Voorwinden; Jan P C Jaspers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Psychosocial impact of prognostic genetic testing in uveal melanoma patients: a controlled prospective clinical observational study.

Authors:  Marietta Lieb; Sefik Tagay; Anja Breidenstein; Tobias Hepp; Claudia H D Le Guin; Jennifer Scheel; Dietmar R Lohmann; Norbert Bornfeld; Martin Teufel; Yesim Erim
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2020-01-31

8.  COVID-19 experiences predicting high anxiety and depression among a sample of BRCA1/BRCA2-positive women in the US.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Psychosocial impact of prognostic genetic testing in the care of uveal melanoma patients: protocol of a controlled prospective clinical observational study.

Authors:  Yesim Erim; Jennifer Scheel; Anja Breidenstein; Claudia Hd Metz; Dietmar Lohmann; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Sefik Tagay
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.