Literature DB >> 22314975

Optimal solution for a cancer radiotherapy problem.

A Bertuzzi1, C Bruni, F Papa, C Sinisgalli.   

Abstract

We address the problem of finding the optimal radiotherapy fractionation scheme, representing the response to radiation of tumour and normal tissues by the LQ model including exponential repopulation and sublethal damage due to incomplete repair. We formulate the nonlinear programming problem of maximizing the overall tumour damage, while keeping the damages to the late and early responding normal tissues within a given admissible level. The optimum is searched over a single week of treatment and its possible structures are identified. In the two simpler but important cases of absence of the incomplete repair term or of prevalent late constraint, we prove the uniqueness of the optimal solution and we characterize it in terms of model parameters. The optimal solution is found to be not necessarily uniform over the week. The theoretical results are confirmed by numerical tests and comparisons with literature fractionation schemes are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22314975     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-012-0512-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  26 in total

1.  Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Eva K Lee; Tim Fox; Ian Crocker
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Adaptive fractionation therapy: II. Biological effective dose.

Authors:  Mingli Chen; Weiguo Lu; Quan Chen; Kenneth Ruchala; Gustavo Olivera
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Some implications of linear-quadratic-linear radiation dose-response with regard to hypofractionation.

Authors:  Melvin Astrahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  D J Brenner; E J Hall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Is there an optimum overall time for head and neck radiotherapy? A review, with new modelling.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.126

7.  Extending the linear-quadratic model for large fraction doses pertinent to stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Guerrero; X Allen Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Optimum overall times II: Extended modelling for head and neck radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Jack F Fowler; Mark A Ritter; Rick J Chappell; David J Brenner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Modeling of radiogenic responses induced by fractionated irradiation in malignant and normal tissue.

Authors:  W Düchting; T Ginsberg; W Ulmer
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.277

View more
  4 in total

1.  Simultaneous optimization of dose distributions and fractionation schemes in particle radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Chuan Zeng; Martijn Engelsman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimization of radiation dosing schedules for proneural glioblastoma.

Authors:  H Badri; K Pitter; E C Holland; F Michor; K Leder
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Optimal weekly scheduling in fractionated radiotherapy: effect of an upper bound on the dose fraction size.

Authors:  C Bruni; F Conte; F Papa; C Sinisgalli
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Identification of crucial parameters in a mathematical multiscale model of glioblastoma growth.

Authors:  Tina A Schuetz; Andreas Mang; Stefan Becker; Alina Toma; Thorsten M Buzug
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.238

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.