Literature DB >> 22314806

Measuring peptide translocation into large unilamellar vesicles.

Sara A Spinella1, Rachel B Nelson, Donald E Elmore.   

Abstract

There is an active interest in peptides that readily cross cell membranes without the assistance of cell membrane receptors(1). Many of these are referred to as cell-penetrating peptides, which are frequently noted for their potential as drug delivery vectors(1-3). Moreover, there is increasing interest in antimicrobial peptides that operate via non-membrane lytic mechanisms(4,5), particularly those that cross bacterial membranes without causing cell lysis and kill cells by interfering with intracellular processes(6,7). In fact, authors have increasingly pointed out the relationship between cell-penetrating and antimicrobial peptides(1,8). A firm understanding of the process of membrane translocation and the relationship between peptide structure and its ability to translocate requires effective, reproducible assays for translocation. Several groups have proposed methods to measure translocation into large unilamellar lipid vesicles (LUVs)(9-13). LUVs serve as useful models for bacterial and eukaryotic cell membranes and are frequently used in peptide fluorescent studies(14,15). Here, we describe our application of the method first developed by Matsuzaki and co-workers to consider antimicrobial peptides, such as magainin and buforin II(16,17). In addition to providing our protocol for this method, we also present a straightforward approach to data analysis that quantifies translocation ability using this assay. The advantages of this translocation assay compared to others are that it has the potential to provide information about the rate of membrane translocation and does not require the addition of a fluorescent label, which can alter peptide properties(18), to tryptophan-containing peptides. Briefly, translocation ability into lipid vesicles is measured as a function of the Foster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) between native tryptophan residues and dansyl phosphatidylethanolamine when proteins are associated with the external LUV membrane (Figure 1). Cell-penetrating peptides are cleaved as they encounter uninhibited trypsin encapsulated with the LUVs, leading to disassociation from the LUV membrane and a drop in FRET signal. The drop in FRET signal observed for a translocating peptide is significantly greater than that observed for the same peptide when the LUVs contain both trypsin and trypsin inhibitor, or when a peptide that does not spontaneously cross lipid membranes is exposed to trypsin-containing LUVs. This change in fluorescence provides a direct quantification of peptide translocation over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22314806      PMCID: PMC3353517          DOI: 10.3791/3571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  20 in total

1.  Translocation of histone proteins across lipid bilayers and Mycoplasma membranes.

Authors:  Joseph Rosenbluh; Elana Hariton-Gazal; Arie Dagan; Shlomo Rottem; Adolf Graessmann; Abraham Loyter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  The use of cell-penetrating peptides for drug delivery.

Authors:  Jamal Temsamani; Pierre Vidal
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Translocation of a channel-forming antimicrobial peptide, magainin 2, across lipid bilayers by forming a pore.

Authors:  K Matsuzaki; O Murase; N Fujii; K Miyajima
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-05-16       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Translocation of beta-galactosidase mediated by the cell-penetrating peptide pep-1 into lipid vesicles and human HeLa cells is driven by membrane electrostatic potential.

Authors:  Sónia Troeira Henriques; Júlia Costa; Miguel A R B Castanho
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Mechanism of action of the antimicrobial peptide buforin II: buforin II kills microorganisms by penetrating the cell membrane and inhibiting cellular functions.

Authors:  C B Park; H S Kim; S C Kim
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1998-03-06       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Interactions of the novel antimicrobial peptide buforin 2 with lipid bilayers: proline as a translocation promoting factor.

Authors:  S Kobayashi; K Takeshima; C B Park; S C Kim; K Matsuzaki
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-07-25       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Membrane translocation mechanism of the antimicrobial peptide buforin 2.

Authors:  Satoe Kobayashi; Akinori Chikushi; Shiho Tougu; Yuichi Imura; Minoru Nishida; Yoshiaki Yano; Katsumi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  How to measure and analyze tryptophan fluorescence in membranes properly, and why bother?

Authors:  A S Ladokhin; S Jayasinghe; S H White
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 9.  Chances and pitfalls of cell penetrating peptides for cellular drug delivery.

Authors:  Rachel Tréhin; Hans P Merkle
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.571

10.  Mechanisms of action on Escherichia coli of cecropin P1 and PR-39, two antibacterial peptides from pig intestine.

Authors:  H G Boman; B Agerberth; A Boman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  7 in total

1.  Using fluorescence microscopy to shed light on the mechanisms of antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Anne K Buck; Donald E Elmore; Louise Eo Darling
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.808

2.  Production and Visualization of Bacterial Spheroplasts and Protoplasts to Characterize Antimicrobial Peptide Localization.

Authors:  Dania M Figueroa; Heidi M Wade; Katrina P Montales; Donald E Elmore; Louise E O Darling
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Modular analysis of hipposin, a histone-derived antimicrobial peptide consisting of membrane translocating and membrane permeabilizing fragments.

Authors:  Maria E Bustillo; Alexandra L Fischer; Maria A LaBouyer; Julia A Klaips; Andrew C Webb; Donald E Elmore
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-04-18

4.  Role of arginine and lysine in the antimicrobial mechanism of histone-derived antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Kara J Cutrona; Bethany A Kaufman; Dania M Figueroa; Donald E Elmore
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 5.  Mechanistic Landscape of Membrane-Permeabilizing Peptides.

Authors:  Shantanu Guha; Jenisha Ghimire; Eric Wu; William C Wimley
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 6.  Peptides used in the delivery of small noncoding RNA.

Authors:  Ravi S Shukla; Bin Qin; Kun Cheng
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Inositol Pyrophosphate Synthesis by Diphosphoinositol Pentakisphosphate Kinase-1 is Regulated by Phosphatidylinositol(4,5)bisphosphate.

Authors:  Vasudha S Nair; Chunfang Gu; Agnes K Janoshazi; Henning J Jessen; Huanchen Wang; Stephen B Shears
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.