OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficiency of the French national screening program for 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21-OHD). Neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-OHD is mainly intended to prevent death due to salt wasting but remains controversial because of the number of false-positive results and the ease with which most female cases can be identified by virilized genitalia at birth. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: National neonatal screening program, pediatric endocrinologists nationwide, and reference center for genotyping. PARTICIPANTS: All neonates screened for 21-OHD in mainland France between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2003. OUTCOME MEASURES: Screening efficiency indicators, disease severity, contribution of screening to early diagnosis, and disease-specific mortality before and during the study period. RESULTS: A total of 6,012,798 neonates were screened; results in 15,407 were considered positive for 21-OHD. Three hundred eighty-three cases were identified, giving a prevalence of 1 for every 15,699 births. The positive predictive value of screening was 2.3% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.6%), with a sensitivity of 93.5% (90.9%-95.9%) and a specificity of 99.7% (99.7%-99.7%). The false-positive rate was particularly high in preterm infants, for which the positive predictive value was 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.5%). Screening allowed clinical diagnosis in 162 of 383 cases (42.3%), with the others being detected clinically or through family history. There was a trend toward declining neonatal mortality due to 21-OHD. CONCLUSIONS: In this large population-based study, the efficiency of routine 21-OHD screening was moderate in neonates born at term and very low in preterm neonates. We recommend the discontinuation of screening, as currently performed in France, in preterm neonates.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficiency of the French national screening program for 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21-OHD). Neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-OHD is mainly intended to prevent death due to salt wasting but remains controversial because of the number of false-positive results and the ease with which most female cases can be identified by virilized genitalia at birth. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: National neonatal screening program, pediatric endocrinologists nationwide, and reference center for genotyping. PARTICIPANTS: All neonates screened for 21-OHD in mainland France between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2003. OUTCOME MEASURES: Screening efficiency indicators, disease severity, contribution of screening to early diagnosis, and disease-specific mortality before and during the study period. RESULTS: A total of 6,012,798 neonates were screened; results in 15,407 were considered positive for 21-OHD. Three hundred eighty-three cases were identified, giving a prevalence of 1 for every 15,699 births. The positive predictive value of screening was 2.3% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.6%), with a sensitivity of 93.5% (90.9%-95.9%) and a specificity of 99.7% (99.7%-99.7%). The false-positive rate was particularly high in preterm infants, for which the positive predictive value was 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.5%). Screening allowed clinical diagnosis in 162 of 383 cases (42.3%), with the others being detected clinically or through family history. There was a trend toward declining neonatal mortality due to 21-OHD. CONCLUSIONS: In this large population-based study, the efficiency of routine 21-OHD screening was moderate in neonates born at term and very low in preterm neonates. We recommend the discontinuation of screening, as currently performed in France, in preterm neonates.
Authors: Adina F Turcu; Juilee Rege; Robert Chomic; Jiayan Liu; Hiromi K Nishimoto; Tobias Else; Andreas G Moraitis; Ganesh S Palapattu; William E Rainey; Richard J Auchus Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Phyllis W Speiser; Wiebke Arlt; Richard J Auchus; Laurence S Baskin; Gerard S Conway; Deborah P Merke; Heino F L Meyer-Bahlburg; Walter L Miller; M Hassan Murad; Sharon E Oberfield; Perrin C White Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Hedi L Claahsen-van der Grinten; Phyllis W Speiser; S Faisal Ahmed; Wiebke Arlt; Richard J Auchus; Henrik Falhammar; Christa E Flück; Leonardo Guasti; Angela Huebner; Barbara B M Kortmann; Nils Krone; Deborah P Merke; Walter L Miller; Anna Nordenström; Nicole Reisch; David E Sandberg; Nike M M L Stikkelbroeck; Philippe Touraine; Agustini Utari; Stefan A Wudy; Perrin C White Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Zhuoguang Li; Lianjing Huang; Caiqi Du; Cai Zhang; Mini Zhang; Yan Liang; Xiaoping Luo Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Mirela Costa de Miranda; Luciana Bertocco de Paiva Haddad; Evelinda Trindade; Alex Cassenote; Giselle Y Hayashi; Durval Damiani; Fernanda Cavalieri Costa; Guiomar Madureira; Berenice Bilharinho de Mendonca; Tania A S S Bachega Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.418